Which doesn't make much sense since they conducted handwriting analysis way back when and ruled it inconclusive. The expert in the doc said it alone wasn't enough and they needed to compare many individual letters. LE should have been able to do that years ago despite the "BEVERLEY" sample. Frustrating!! And to prove motive in the best friend killing, they essentially have to prove she knew too much about the wife's murder... which they can't prove. RD may think he's a jinx but he sure is one lucky guy. :/
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk, y'all!
LA Times has an updated article up but (maybe its just me) I can barely follow it.
Most clear is:
"New Orleans judge ordered former New York district attorney Jeanine Pirro to vacate a courtroom Monday during a bond hearing for real estate scion Robert Durst.
Durst’s attorney Dick DeGuerin said in court he plans to call Pirro, who was sitting in the front row, as a potential witness in the case."
http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-robert-durst-new-orleans-hearing-20150323-story.html
DEVELOPING @FBI monitoried #RobertDurst movements & calls. Followed him from Houston to Beaumont on 3/10, then lost him. @jacelarson reports
#RobertDurst def says @ Pirro - "she's here because she's been participating in the dogging of Mr. Durst for years and years."
In reading A Deadly Secret the NYPD, 20th Precinct investigated the case for a year at first. They had some decent circumstantial evidence but didn't think it strong enough to hold up against a team of Durst money bought lawyers.
The investigator combined this with what he found out about Kathie. He didn't want to drag her name through the mud. She'd had affairs (Bob had too), was having trouble in med school and using quite a lot of cocaine. In fact, Bob told LE he thought she'd run off with a dealer.
Without a body and/or stronger evidence the lead investigator and his supervisor decided against moving forward immediately after the disappearance
In reading A Deadly Secret the NYPD, 20th Precinct investigated the case for a year at first. They had some decent circumstantial evidence but didn't think it strong enough to hold up against a team of Durst money bought lawyers.
The investigator combined this with what he found out about Kathie. He didn't want to drag her name through the mud. She'd had affairs (Bob had too), was having trouble in med school and using quite a lot of cocaine. In fact, Bob told LE he thought she'd run off with a dealer.
Without a body and/or stronger evidence the lead investigator and his supervisor decided against moving forward immediately after the disappearance