GrainneDhu
Verified Expert
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2010
- Messages
- 5,159
- Reaction score
- 53
I removed this post because on re-reading, it was totally ridiculous.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I suppose she went on the defensive because she clearly did not want to disclose her whereabouts on the day he went missing.
http://www.kgw.com/news/local/Desiree-Young-on-Terri-Moulton-I-know-shes-lying-98075814.html
While Terri Horman has said she was in certain locations, investigators have placed her elsewhere using bank card records and cell phone pings, according to sources.
Why lie?
Trouble is, even with that, I don't see how someone who has a significant parental role in raising a child would feel persecuted by the investigators in this situation.
From   http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/persecute
Persecute means:
1. to pursue with harassing or oppressive treatment, esp.because of religion, race, or beliefs; harass persistently.
2. to annoy or trouble persistently.
I would like to be troubled persistently if it would help find a missing child, unless I had something significant to hide. It doesn't mean I would enjoy relinquishing any secrets I had, but relinquish them I would because that would be far less important to me than finding the child.
Also, if I were innocent, I would proclaim that loudly and persistently to anyone who would listen.
Does anyone have a link that LE ever states that TH is not cooperating with the investigation. Or if LE ever said that she was lying ?
LE that is in the investigation, not LE outside of the investigation.
TIA
OK, for the sake of argument, let's say TH is innocent. And therefore suppose that TH was NOT defensive about Kyron's disappearance, but because of whatever it was she was doing that day that she didn't want to admit to her family and the police.
Now she realizes she's suspected of kidnap and perhaps murder, at least by her family, and her baby has been taken from her based upon this suspicion.
Why wouldn't she admit what she was really doing the day Kyron vanished? Could it be WORSE than kidnap and murder of your own stepchild? I don't think anything is worse than that. So if there WAS something she was doing that day other than abducting Kyron - something secret that she didn't want to share - why wouldn't she just confess whatever it was as it would at least clear her of suspicion of murder?
We don't know that she didn't tell the police.
I meant tell her family. Since they are the ones telling the public that they suspect her.
I mean no matter what it was - affair, cult, theft, drugs - if she was doing something other than what she initially told police that day, it wasn't as bad as what her husband suspects her of.
I feel like the Youngs have been very patient and given TH the benefit of the doubt until it was obvious that there was no doubt she had a hand in it.
IMOO of course....
and a little OT, but my son just said the sweetest thing...
"Do you think we could call that lady, (Terri) and maybe I could talk to her and ask her nicely to let Kyron come home? His mom is really sad and I think she needs him."
*heart breaking*
So how does a person who is telling the truth get so many people convinced that she's lying? If the police were able to check her story and it all matched, would they let the family continue their allegations against an innocent person?
looking at individual moments like this is tricky...b/c standing alone, maybe its no so surprising that she would initially balk at her life becoming an open book, especially if she had stuff going on that she wanted to hide. I would venture to guess that her marriage wasn't that great even at that point in time, so likely there was stuff she'd not want known. So a momentary expression of hesitancy would not be indicative of anything.
But put together with other moments, it starts to make a complete picture.
All I can say about that picture... is the parts we do know... (and I'm excluding the rumors and the bizzarro BFH plot) it doesn't seem to me to be in any way what I would think a picture of wrongly accused completely innocent woman would look like. I can understand wanting to obey your lawyer by being silent so as to not take on risk to yourself that could jeopardize your future, but I don't think that's exactly the choice she's been making. The choices she's been making paint the picture of a person with no impulse control,and no ability to empathize, even with people she "loves". THAT kind of person, IMO, would have responded to TY's warnings exactly the way she did... if she were trying to behave herself and not shock people by flat out refusing to participate.
Clearly they think she's lying, but we don't have any evidence either way about whether she actually is lying. And if they're so convinced that she's untruthful, they quite likely wouldn't believe anything she said anyway.
I guess what I'm trying to say is - if the rumors about her bank cards /cell pings are true, and she was not where she claimed to be, but it was for a reason other than abducting Kyron, then I'd be very surprised that she wasn't admitting to the lesser offense.
I don't feel like she's someone who would be stopped by the fear she'd be disbelieved.
Also, whatever she may have told the police, it wasn't enough to stop them from telling her husband that he would be wise to leave her and take the baby away.