I agree ...I wouldn't want to hang around, especially where the gun might be going to be disposed of
having said that, some things do. seem a bit amateurish about the case...but that might. just be the account of events has been doctored
I’m not convinced accounts have been doctored. I just think there is a chunk of information missing re what was said when he went back inside.
One of the reasons I think it’s more local, is because the decision to kill him appears to of been made when he returned to the door imo. If it hadn’t, he’d of been shot first time round. if it was a hit, then he’d of been shot as soon as the killer confirmed his identity no? And I understand people who say well, perhaps he was meant to put something in the envelope, and that’s why the killer was waiting. I’ve said it myself in my theory, but apart from something like what I’ve said in my theory. What on earth can be so important that the person who kills Alistair needs it, before doing so. He’s dead! He can’t divulge anything! ( evidence) and if they needed anything from him that desperately, then killing him put and end to their whole reason for being there.
Is it possible it was someone who decided to hide the real reason for the visit used the envelope to confuse the inquiry, yes. But they really don’t need to hide it do they because 18 years on they have not been caught, and theories still fly round within police Scotland who still don’t know the motive, despite the recent news headlines, as they themselves have said. ( we still aren’t ruling out anything) Besides having a theory is all well and good, but being able to prove it is another. The killer certainly seems to have covered their tracks without the need for the envelope confusion.
I don’t think he was asked to do anything for the person who killed him either, ( negotiate) as if he was he never would of returNed to the door.He also would of made that decision during the conversation he had with him, unless of course the decision needed Veronica. ( unlikely) He returned based on what the killer had said to him.( Presumably what he had told him was in the envelope) ?
Could this tell us Alistair either did or didn’t comply With the reason for the visit?
Somethings scream professional, others really do not. But if we look at the other murders where the is a mixed profile it can indicate more than one offender.
The murder of the off duty police officer happens in a very similar way to this crime, re the weapon placement. This usually tells us that the person has some forensic awareness, & knows the weapon can not be traced back to them, ( possibly provided to the killer)
It is when I look at all this separately it confuses me. When I put it all together it tells more of a story. A story of a man who turns up at his house on a Sunday evening, has a chat with him and waits for him to return. ( very personal) A story that Alistair knew what the conversation was about or he never would of taken the envelope. A story he did not tell his wife about the reason, and in failing to comply, or complying with what the man had said to him, it led to his death. (It’s more like a process). That’s why my theory was the only thing I could really come up with about why he went back inside. He believed there was something inside that envelope,( based on what the killer had said) but they also needed something from him. (2 fold)
The one thing I do find odd though,is that Veronica calls this man a gentleman, in the interview she does on Fiona Walkers Podcast. Bizarre!