Tortoise
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2015
- Messages
- 26,283
- Reaction score
- 132,463
I don't think my list of questions was that difficult.I think your a little muddled. Maybe worth going back and watching the documentary to help clarify things for you. The legal team have seen them but not the documentary makers.
The CPS have a two code test when presented a prospective charge from the police. Thry have to fulfil this to be accepted, which as spoke about in the documentary was manipulated by the police. As soon as the prosecution barrister saw the proof of charge the case was dismissed due to a lack of evidence.
Having the prosecution bundle is fully legal and all above board.
All witnesses form part of the case
The case not proceeding isn't something that I've asked you about, but I have asked about the alibi witnesses and whether there is anything that prevents them from coming forward and speaking about witnessing PH that afternoon.
The police said as recently as this year that they maintain PH had opportunity. If, as you say, the 10 witnesses form part of the case then clearly the 10 witnesses do not give PH a cast iron alibi, as far as the police are concerned. It really would be a very simple matter to show how the witness evidence is so indisputable that it puts PH in the clear. It's a shame you're not in a position to further enlighten us on this forum.