Here's the wording from sky news
"The man accused of the abduction and murder of April Jones has appeared in court and pleaded not guilty.
Mark Bridger, 46, sat in the dock at Mold Crown Court flanked by two security guards as details of the charges were read out. He replied "not guilty" clearly to the charges as April Jones' parents stared into the glass-fronted dock.
The judge made an order under the Contempt of Court Act that none of the evidence mentioned should be publicly reported.
But he made it clear that defending barrister Brendan Kelly QCs statement that the defendant was not guilty of murder but that he accepted that he was probably responsible for the death of April could be publicly reported.
Earlier the murmurings from people gathering in Court One fell were silenced as Mr and Mrs Jones walked in with police family liaison officers.
Bridger, who appeared in court wearing jeans and a navy sweater, will face trial next month.
As well as facing charges of abducting and murdering April, Bridger is also accused of unlawfully disposing of and concealing her body with intent to pervert the course of justice."
Why would the judge allow anything to be released publicly now accept the plea?