Whoever killed her I would suggest is nothing but an animalWhat do you mean by that?
Whoever killed her I would suggest is nothing but an animalWhat do you mean by that?
its hard or almost impossible to get a successful prosecution without a body or a full confession!I guess the police could hypnotise a few witnesses to see what they were doing on March 18th/19th 2009.
What do you mean by that?
Judge Ryder very revealing ...not !
its hard or almost impossible to get a successful prosecution without a body or a full confession!
As suspected just an overview of events. Little tidbits like the phone charger was still in socket when father and landlord came into her house on the Friday morning, no evidence of struggle in house, DNA found etc.
Also confirmed Jen King's partner had been arrested in 2014 (no names given though). She's certainly had a makeover in last decade.
Possibly a predator?Whoever killed her I would suggest is nothing but an animal
Why would she take a charger to work? If charged then it would have enough battery life to last her normal shift and journey home.I saw the programme and it's strange Claudia did not take the charger with her to work. However ; some people do have 2 chargers and leave 1 at home,and carry 1 with them.
Her friends,family and work colleagues should know if she had 2 chargers
If Claudia did only have 1 charger; it could suggest she was in a rush in the morning, or suddenly summoned. It could also point to Claudia going missing during the night at home
Helen McCourt's killer was convicted of murder without finding her body. Sadly, he's out of prison now.Judge Ryder very revealing ...not !
its hard or almost impossible to get a successful prosecution without a body or a full confession!
I agree some what, phones back then lasted at least all day if not more once charged, no need to take a charger ever. Haven’t seen the programme- but they can only release what is in the public domain. Only an investigative journalist would put the time into properly digging deep into it. Judge Rinder is a lawyer who makes day time tv- all he can do is relook at what we already know.Why would she take a charger to work? If charged then it would have enough battery life to last her normal shift and journey home.
very poor programme in my opinion.
I would be interested in where abouts in the house they found the male fingerprint
I saw the programme and it's strange Claudia did not take the charger with her to work. However ; some people do have 2 chargers and leave 1 at home,and carry 1 with them.
Her friends,family and work colleagues should know if she had 2 chargers
If Claudia did only have 1 charger; it could suggest she was in a rush in the morning, or suddenly summoned. It could also point to Claudia going missing during the night at home
See I do notice stuff like that- cables, plugs,chargers drive me loopy. But I can tell you honestly no one had to carry a charger or a cable when she disappeared. If anything it implies she took it when out for an expected and very extended period- which in this case she didn’t (which is most peoples normal)TBH i am currently at work (in a social not desked environment) with 7 colleagues (same ones every single shift) and i have absolutely no idea if... a) any of them have 2 phone chargers b)If any or which even have a charger here with them tonight.
Also i have no idea how many chargers anyone i live with own.
IMO you don't need to be in much of a rush.....ie Just a normal morning couple minutes behind to forget a phone charger,or just a quick distraction to forget,or thought it was already in her bag....imo, although it could theoretically... i don't think it points to be suddenly or suspiciously summoned. JMO
See I do notice stuff like that- cables, plugs,chargers drive me loopy. But I can tell you honestly no one had to carry a charger or a cable when she disappeared. If anything it implies she took it when out for an expected and very extended period- which in this case she didn’t (which is most peoples normal)
I don’t need to remember that time, I just know it is only in the four years or less I have needed to have access to a charger.TBH i can't remember about charging times for phones at that time....but imo she could have accidentally or purposely left it at home, so has no bearing on what happened.
Did the Nags Head have cctv facing Heworth Road?
The fact her charger was in the house strengths Claudia’s intention to return home afterward and possibly meet her agreement with SCI agree some what, phones back then lasted at least all day if not more once charged, no need to take a charger ever. Haven’t seen the programme- but they can only release what is in the public domain. Only an investigative journalist would put the time into properly digging deep into it. Judge Rinder is a lawyer who makes day time tv- all he can do is relook at what we already know.