I am finding this case very frustrating. With links to both his home town and his last known location, I'm interested in Doug's case and would like to be able to come up with something constructive, but there's just so little to go on.
As far as I can see, there's no information on what connection, if any, he has with the location where his car was found. The posters say that it was found 'on the Ridgeway', as if the presumption is that he has travelled along the Ridgeway in one or other direction, rather than staying in that area or moving/travelling onwards by some ordinary means.
Was he a walker? Had he been there before? Was he from that area originally or was anyone significant in striking distance? Are any of the villages or locations on the Ridgeway of significance? In short, is there anything about that location as a place he drove to and parked at that is not completely random? We just don't seem to know. Nothing seems to have been said at all, even anything that suggests it
was random. Did the car still have petrol in it? Was it caught on ANPR en route and if so was his route direct or haphazard?
Furthermore, the fb page seems to be being run by someone who's not at the heart of the investigation. Has his bank account seen any action? Has his phone yielded any information? The police have looked at these things apparently but according to the fb page they 'don't make these things public' - well, no, but they would tell the family. This is information that is usually in the public domain in missing persons cases afaik.
The story is that land and drone searches have been unsuccessful because there's just so much land there to search, and it's rural and not densely populated, and there are so many villages and farms and buildings and sheds... but I'm not seeing how this is different from any other rural or semi rural area. The recent search effort for Frankie Morris in North Wales involved drones, helicopters, SAR teams, dogs, horses, divers, etc in terrain that was more difficult if anything. Frankie was young, but not a minor, and Doug is described as being 'at high risk', so what is the difference?
I'm in two (OK, three) minds as to whether Thames Valley Police have dropped the ball, whether the family is not supportive of a high profile campaign for whatever reason, or whether this is genuinely a more problematic disappearance than many. Is it administrative? The Ridgeway crosses the border between the Thames Valley Police area into the Wiltshire Police area. Has Doug been caught in the crossfire of an argument about who pays for the drones and the dogs? I can hardly believe it, and yet frustratingly little seems to have been attempted except a lot of postering that has achieved nothing as far as I can see.
Is it just me? I feel like I want to try and get some answers with this case, even if they're not happy ones.
JMO