ColourPurple
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2015
- Messages
- 4,209
- Reaction score
- 12,841
If the starting point for murder for financial gain is 30 years then hes getting 30 years plus as I really don't see how Flint is going to argue that it wasn't for financial gain. He can't use the "he'd have been better off waiting till they married if he was after her money" excuse as 1. That was false and 2.If he'd waited till they were married Helen would still have to die for IS got everything, so to enure he did get everything it would still involve him having to commit murder to get the money, so it'd still be murder for financial gain.
Also having money already doesn't mean somebody wouldn't murder to get much more money.
Also having money already doesn't mean somebody wouldn't murder to get much more money.