JudgeJudi
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2014
- Messages
- 10,622
- Reaction score
- 31,380
11:16
“She said ‘this is something I might take’ because she was having problems sleeping as well.”
“It was just one little box, but I never even got to open the box. “I didn’t take any zopiclone because Helen is one hell of a reader and she researches everything. “In this case as soon as she saw Helen had prescribed zopiclone she googled this away. “She wanted to know the facts and the facts behind the facts. “She found that zopiclone should not be given to a patient with my health condition. “She took the tablets off me and said ‘you’re not taking those’. “She said ‘this is something I might take’ because she was having problems sleeping as well.” Three days after Stewart was prescribed zopiclone, Helen was complaining of signs of the menopause to a GP, the court was told. “Helen was either too hot or too cold.” Defence barrister Simon Russell Flint asks: “Had you fed her so many tablets that she was suffering with this, or was it something she had for a while? “No, it was something she had for a while”, Stewart answers. “Helen didn’t like taking drugs but she did when necessary. “She sometimes took anti sickness pills when we had a long drive.”
How does he explain away the fact that he'd been prescribed Zopiclone on a number of occasions? Is he suggesting he attended the doctors and got prescriptions but in reality they were for her? Lies, lies and more lies. And yet the jury is meant to believe that she knowingly took Zopiclone and then wondered why she was falling asleep all the time. This is outrageous.