GUILTY UK - Helen Bailey, 51, Royston, 11 April 2016 #8

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves

New Posts

Status
Not open for further replies.
Tortoise said:
Well there are enough of us here to do a quick straw poll.

If anyone here thinks IS has raised reasonable doubt please thank my post.

Go on, don't be shy!
Click to expand...

Hahaha scrap my thanks, I am on an iPad and have sausage fingers [emoji33][emoji33][emoji33]


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
Cherwell said:
So do we think it's the prosecution recalling the computer expert? Could there be some new evidence? That might explain the later start, as the judge would have to give permission.
Click to expand...

Maybe IS said something in his testomy that resulted in the prosecution/police go back to look at the computer evidence again eg did Helen delete her searches regularly or just in the month of April.
 
mbmc said:
Hahaha scrap my thanks, I am on an iPad and have sausage fingers [emoji33][emoji33][emoji33]


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

There's always one lol

(sorry that sounds a bit rude of me. I meant always one who presses the button by mistake in case it wasn't clear)
 
mbmc said:
Hahaha scrap my thanks, I am on an iPad and have sausage fingers [emoji33][emoji33][emoji33]


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

LOL....mbmc......scared me for a sec
 
T41 said:
i think best she's there and time and energy occupied that way than at home for her mind to come up with perceived injustices and retaliations? Mental health care is dire here. Wish it weren't and people get the support they need.
Click to expand...


You are probably right. I agree totally about dire mental health care. I posted previously how IS has managed to rope in all these MH professionals for his purposes whilst young people (and older ones) are killing themselves or living zombie lives because of the lack of provision. Even when they "get help" it's often a prescription and a weekly visit from a nurse with whom they have nothing in common and who stays an hour asking what they are doing at the weekend-not real therapy or support.
 
icemaiden65 said:
It was attempted murder I referred to - so possibly thought of as just an every day run of the mill sort of case. It still doesn't excuse folk wanting to just dump and run.
Click to expand...

My particular speciality in life is unintentionally offending :) So sorry, I didn't mean to suggest they were inconsequential experiences; it was more just an indication of how high profile this case is and that I was hoping the jury might understand the importance. It was more hopeful thinking for this jury than disparaging of other jurys. I completely agree that no jury should want to dump and run, but fully expect that of some people in some situations is all I meant. Sorry if I sounded dismissive - not my intention x
 
Cherwell said:
So do we think it's the prosecution recalling the computer expert? Could there be some new evidence? That might explain the later start, as the judge would have to give permission.
Click to expand...

I know this much... It doesn't bode well for the unkempt BeeGee!! :floorlaugh:
 
Before court resumes I just want to pop in and thank you all for the updates, comments, information, giggles and little insights. Due to broadband problems I wasn't able to be online much this week :furious: and had to catch up on a whole thread. I'm reading now though and am in real time at last. I have enormous gratitude to you all here for the constant postings, be lost without you. :tyou:
 
Tortoise said:
There's always one lol

(sorry that sounds a bit rude of me. I meant always one who presses the button by mistake in case it wasn't clear)
Click to expand...

Lol.....yes I am the one! I am on Tapatalk and when scrolling I find that I have followed EVERYONE hahahaha, I must seem like a stalker! (Managed to right this though)





Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
LozDa said:
My particular speciality in life is unintentionally offending :) So sorry, I didn't mean to suggest they were inconsequential experiences; it was more just an indication of how high profile this case is and that I was hoping the jury might understand the importance. It was more hopeful thinking for this jury than disparaging of other jurys. I completely agree that no jury should want to dump and run, but fully expect that of some people in some situations is all I meant. Sorry if I sounded dismissive - not my intention x
Click to expand...

No worries! Perhaps I have less faith in human nature and justice being done. Glass half empty syndrome. x
 
Researched the Broadstairs cafe run by Edward Farmer witness - can't find sold date. BUT it seems the proprietor listed is a Mr M Trimmer!!??
 
Cherwell said:
I really don't think there's anything to worry about in this case. Observers have mentioned that the jury don't seem to be buying IS's stories.
Click to expand...

You know I always have a bit of a wobble at this stage in a case, where I think "OMG what if they get away with this???" Well the wobble is only a little one this time and I'll be shocked to the core if he's found not guilty.
 
jenspired said:
This is the first trial I've followed in such detail and via WebSleuths. I originally thought it could never match the Perry Mason TV shows I loved watching in my youth but it surpassed my expectations.

He is guilty as sure as there's a y in the day.

As Helen retweeted:
d59f8ea965da5d596e5b31e7064adf98.jpg


Oh what a tangled web we weave
Click to expand...

And, as mused Chaucer, Murder will out.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

DNASolves

Who is Fairfield County Jane Doe (1993)?

Staff online

Members online

... and 66 more.
Total: 372 (members: 67, guests: 305)

Online statistics

Members online
67
Guests online
305
Total visitors
372
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
608,352
Messages
18,238,117
Members
234,350
Latest member
pto002studyguide
Back
Top