GUILTY UK - Joanna Yeates, 25, Clifton, Bristol, 17 Dec 2010 #10

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
Wouldn't it be just as likely that a workmate would say she could stay overnight at theirs? That'd be cheaper than a hotel

Or maybe workmates also live in Bristol all share a lift or deligated a driver for the night....
 
regarding the sighting of 2 / 3 people around the entrance to Jo's flat around 9 pm on the 17th

if these people were passers by why have they not come forward to be eliminated from the enquiry?

other witnesses have and tell of hearing screams etc ... and their accounts have not been discounted to date

if these 2 / 3 were involved in the case and one was indeed the man charged was it not noticed that he was 6 ft 4 ?
 
Anyone know what if anything became of the private CCTV footage from a neighbour's house? Last week it was mentioned and that the neighbour handed all the film to the police.

It seems there is a lot of information we don't know about.
 
The red jumper might be what he was wearing when arrested. This is what happens when a UK case becomes sub judice, there are no new facts or information and people begin to microsleuth people's clothes, earrings etc, trying to find hidden meanings

JMHO
 
regarding the sighting of 2 / 3 people around the entrance to Jo's flat around 9 pm on the 17th

if these people were passers by why have they not come forward to be eliminated from the enquiry?

other witnesses have and tell of hearing screams etc ... and their accounts have not been discounted to date

if these 2 / 3 were involved in the case and one was indeed the man charged was it not noticed that he was 6 ft 4 ?
That only comes from Jefferies very, very, very vague comment. We never found out what he actually said for fact, just press stories. These 2/3 people might not ever have existed.
 
The red jumper might be what he was wearing when arrested. This is what happens when a UK case becomes sub judice, there are no new facts or information and people begin to microsleuth people's clothes, earrings etc, trying to find hidden meanings

JMHO

When I replied to the original post on his jumper, I was not really being serious. I doubt very much the colour of his jumper is in any way significant.

Saying that wearing red is supposed to be a sexy colour or a dominate alpha-male colour, and females are supposed to relate to it in some sexual way, according to several studies.

That and perhaps he wanted to look like a red-herring?
 
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/jan/24/vincent-tabak-court-joanna-yeates-murder-charge

He was remanded in custody for a week, after which he is due to appear at Bristol crown court. But the court was told today that he may also attend the crown court tomorrow for a bail hearing. A plea and case management hearing was scheduled for 29 April.

Paul Cook, representing Tabak, confirmed that his client wished to apply for bail and would be present for that application tomorrow.

At the end of the hearing, the chairman of the bench, William Summers, told Tabak to stand. Summers said: "You will appear before the crown court tomorrow for a bail application hearing." Tabak was handcuffed and led away.


so what exactly do the police have on him? he must be challenging it


surely his solicitor would advise him not to if the case against him was so strong and to try a plea bargain.
 
Wouldn't the police be forensically analysing all his clothes? Is he likely to be wearing something that's already his or would it be something new?
 
That only comes from Jefferies very, very, very vague comment. We never found out what he actually said for fact, just press stories. These 2/3 people might not ever have existed.

sorry to correct you but CJ told at a minimum ..Liz Lowman from across the street and Mr Hardyman who he has known for 40 years of the sighting of these 2 / 3 people however very, very, very vague it was

he was then forced to tell the police of this when Liz Lowman called the police after CJ told her that he had not told the police when they asked him when it was missing persons enquiry

so if they did not exist he must have lied to the neighbours and the police

or if they did exist he changed his story

he cant have it both ways
 
Be SURE you have read the WS TOS before you continue posting in this thread.


If you see a post that violates the TOS - report it by hitting the little red triangle (Alert button) in the upper right corner of the post. If you respond to the post, you will be held accountable as having broken the TOS.

Bickering, name calling, snarky & rude remarks will NOT be tolerated.

Do NOT tell others what to post.

Do NOT discuss moderation. If you have a question, PM a mod (you can find them via 'View Forum Leaders') or use the Alert button.

Timeouts WILL be recommended for those who cannot or will not adhere to the WS TOS.


'Thank' this post so we know you have read it.
 
regarding the sighting of 2 / 3 people around the entrance to Jo's flat around 9 pm on the 17th

if these people were passers by why have they not come forward to be eliminated from the enquiry?

other witnesses have and tell of hearing screams etc ... and their accounts have not been discounted to date

if these 2 / 3 were involved in the case and one was indeed the man charged was it not noticed that he was 6 ft 4 ?


One thing though - did CJ actually say he saw 2/3 people? Didn't he say he had been much more vague than that? As far as I can remember the 2/3 people thing was never confirmed? Or maybe I missed it
 
sorry to correct you but CJ told at a minimum ..Liz Lowton from across the street and Mr Hardyman who he has known for 40 years of the sighting of these 2 / 3 people however very, very, very vague it was

he was then forced to tell the police of this when Liz Lowton called the police after CJ told her that he had not told the police when they asked him when it was missing persons enquiry

so if they did not exist he must have lied to the neighbours and the police

or if they did exist he changed his story

he cant have it both ways
Well he (C.J) told the Police the truth didn't he under questioning?
So there can't be a shred of truth in these 2/3 people ever existing, or the Police would have wanted to talk to them, if only to eliminate them. The fact that no mention, or such an appeal strongly suggests there never was these 2/3 people.

JMO.
 
Wouldn't the police be forensically analysing all his clothes? Is he likely to be wearing something that's already his or would it be something new?

Whilst possible, I expect any such evidence may long since have gone up in smoke.
 
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/jan/24/vincent-tabak-court-joanna-yeates-murder-charge

He was remanded in custody for a week, after which he is due to appear at Bristol crown court. But the court was told today that he may also attend the crown court tomorrow for a bail hearing. A plea and case management hearing was scheduled for 29 April.

Paul Cook, representing Tabak, confirmed that his client wished to apply for bail and would be present for that application tomorrow.

At the end of the hearing, the chairman of the bench, William Summers, told Tabak to stand. Summers said: "You will appear before the crown court tomorrow for a bail application hearing." Tabak was handcuffed and led away.


so what exactly do the police have on him? he must be challenging it


surely his solicitor would advise him not to if the case against him was so strong and to try a plea bargain.

They arrested CJ on suspicion of murder, who is to say that they have the right man, that is yet to be proved.

As for bail he has a right to it as he is still classed as a free man and (as far as we know) he hasn't committed offences like these in the past.
 
Whilst possible, I expect any such evidence may long since have gone up in smoke.

That wouldn't stop the police confiscating all his belongings though would it? A killer might dispose of what they were wearing at the time but accidentally transfer the victim's hairs or fibres to their other clothes.
 
Anyone know what if anything became of the private CCTV footage from a neighbour's house? Last week it was mentioned and that the neighbour handed all the film to the police.

It seems there is a lot of information we don't know about.

Neighbour would be stretching the definition somewhat. The CCTV was from a house which is right at the other end of Canynge Road about 5 or 6 minutes walk away. Nothing has been mentioned about the content of the video tape.
 
That wouldn't stop the police confiscating all his belongings though would it? A killer might dispose of what they were wearing at the time but accidentally transfer the victim's hairs or fibres to their other clothes.

True.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
212
Guests online
1,777
Total visitors
1,989

Forum statistics

Threads
599,819
Messages
18,099,953
Members
230,933
Latest member
anyclimate3010
Back
Top