Google and Bing overhead maps don't show a dividing fence at the rear. Looks like a communal area.
Would that mean that anyone from the building /road would have access to her front door from the rear ?
Google and Bing overhead maps don't show a dividing fence at the rear. Looks like a communal area.
There would originally have been open fires in every room in that sort of building. Often the flues have been capped, but quite often not. You can still have an open fire in towns so long as you burn only smokeless fuel.This is what I speculated here last night. I asked the question if an open fire existed. Not sure if real fires are allowed in 'built up' areas.
Would that mean that anyone from the building /road would have access to her front door from the rear ?
Would that mean that anyone from the building /road would have access to her front door from the rear ?
I think the problem is the keys. She would have probably not gone out without them, because of the risk of being locked out. So, if one does not have to remove her body from her flat (because she was killed somewhere else), then one has to bring her keys back to her flat. There is no way out.A recent post mentioned the unlikelihood of a perp attempting to place objects back in JY's flat because her door was overlooked by no.42 and the perp might have been seen...and this being too risky....
To this I say..... remember the scaffolding. Given the short distance between no.44 and no.42, anyone looking out of the windows at no.42 would only see scaffold board walkways. Only someone at the side door of no.42 would stand a chance of seeing a perp entering JY's flat and prior warning would be signalled by sound/movement in just enough time to swiftly enter the flat or duck down beside the high wall separating no.44 from no.42. I don't actually think it would be considered 'too risky' by someone who had just killed someone. jmo.
Having said that, I'm not a believer in the theory that belongings were planted back in the flat.
The killer was pegged at being aged 20-25 back in 1974, and if he led a healthy life then of course he could still be here. Anyway, I noticed this earlier on a facebook page and it seem someone else is thinking along similar lines. I've also seen suggestions that there are links to another couple of areas concerning Clifton College in which two other women were found killed in a similar manner to Glenis and Joanna.
http://www.facebook.com/topic.php?uid=128719860525280&topic=345#topic_top
Just posting to say hi really. I've been following the site for some time and feel quite familiar with you all. I don't have any firm opinions about who did it, except that there is so much that we're not being told that it's hard to know what to think. I know that the link to the 1974 (?) murder has been discounted by LE but still can't let it go altogether - I wonder whether the noise of a party going on in the area, which has been mentioned in both cases, could have sparked something off in the perp?
I wonder what the fresh evidence could be that the police uncovered during a search that prompted the arrest of NUA ?
Sky News.
I suppose this will seem to come out of left field but JY does look quite a lot like Claudia Lawrence. If the MAU is innocent is it possible that it is a serial Killer?
I can find a sort of connection to York but it is loose. There is a woman who lives at the same house as JY and MAU who shows on EL for 2010. The previous address that pops up is York 2003. She appears to have a lot of Uni contacts in Bristol so maybe she works at universities and used to work at York uni. Claudia Lawrence worked at York uni.
Maybe she sourced a job for an ex-colleague from York? maybe an old colleague came to visit?
Just thought I'd throw it in there.
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-st...costs-a-small-fortune-to-run-115875-22838073/
http://uk.reuters.com/article/idUKTRE53F4HI20090417
I just read that on the Sky news page.
I don't know what it could be but he's been under surveillance, so could be anything really. It says he was arrested due to fresh evidence, so it's nothing they have found since the arrest, it's referring to something prior to the arrest.