Alyce
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2012
- Messages
- 13,430
- Reaction score
- 55,849
I think a minimum of 35 years is very fitting. I thought Harlow should have had more, as I think (could be wrong) that with good behaviour it could be less?
I also think LH should have got more. He could be out in 4-5 years which does not seem to fit with the Judge's remark of how he would be a danger to women for ** years to come**.
If she had given him 12 minumum I think that would have been more appropriate, considering that the grooming of the two other underage girls was included in the sentencing.