I can't help but think that Leah was lured away on the day she disappeared, if you take a look at the blogs by Lolly and Mickey Womble the circumstances suggest this.
1. On the 14th Feb she came home and then went out immediately, which was apparently not normal.
2. Either she or someone else turned her mobile GPS off on the 14th Feb.
3. On the 15th she was seen by a couple of witnesses talking to someone on her mobile, however, this was not her own and was apparently a new one.
4. The first sighting of her in conversation on her mobile was said to show she was in a distressed state.
4. By contrast the second sighting indicates that she was no longer in a distressed state.
I think it's fair to assume that Leah planned to run away, whoever she planned to do this with turned off her own mobiles GPS and gave her an alternative mobile phone. These two actions are far from normal and very concerning when you take them together.
It's possible that the first phone call was with the person she planned to run away with and he was not where he was supposed to be, hence the distressed state. Then the second call was to arrange her collection, IMO by another person not the one she was laving home for.
She would have then been collected and at this point went freely and as such would not have attracted any unwanted attention, which is why she disappeared without trace.
If my narrative is correct the police will have absolutely nothing to go on, and this will be the reason Leah has not been found.
It needs someone to break what appears to be a wall of silence if the police are to make progress.
1. On the 14th Feb she came home and then went out immediately, which was apparently not normal.
2. Either she or someone else turned her mobile GPS off on the 14th Feb.
3. On the 15th she was seen by a couple of witnesses talking to someone on her mobile, however, this was not her own and was apparently a new one.
4. The first sighting of her in conversation on her mobile was said to show she was in a distressed state.
4. By contrast the second sighting indicates that she was no longer in a distressed state.
I think it's fair to assume that Leah planned to run away, whoever she planned to do this with turned off her own mobiles GPS and gave her an alternative mobile phone. These two actions are far from normal and very concerning when you take them together.
It's possible that the first phone call was with the person she planned to run away with and he was not where he was supposed to be, hence the distressed state. Then the second call was to arrange her collection, IMO by another person not the one she was laving home for.
She would have then been collected and at this point went freely and as such would not have attracted any unwanted attention, which is why she disappeared without trace.
If my narrative is correct the police will have absolutely nothing to go on, and this will be the reason Leah has not been found.
It needs someone to break what appears to be a wall of silence if the police are to make progress.