alfiedug
Active Member
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2019
- Messages
- 121
- Reaction score
- 244
I agree the car in cctv is an Astra Mark 5 SXithe car expert on here told it’s a 100% fact it’s the same car , not a remote possibility of him being wrong he said
I agree the car in cctv is an Astra Mark 5 SXithe car expert on here told it’s a 100% fact it’s the same car , not a remote possibility of him being wrong he said
That would be a good reason to say no. Also saying no would not be enough reason to persuade anyone to sign off a search warrant.I think the homeowner can say no but it would look mighty suspicious! Nothing to hide, nothing to fear, as they say.
Yeah it would back up the male voices!Or possibly a house on Heathcote? I too am starting to lean towards 2 being involved. Would add more weight to the male voices and screams heard. Initially I thought it could be one person talking in perhaps polish/broken English. But what if Libby was attacked in a house near there and then taken to the park and dumped and the park screams were just foxes? JMO
Not if it's in an attempt to save a life, which may apply here.I thought they need a search warrant for any house they search? Am sure they can't just wander in and out searching houses even if someone's missing. What if an owner/occupier says no? What if someone's growing cannabis and doesn't want finding out?
Ah, I was so hung up on the time I didn't even look at the date.
Glad someone was paying attention.
I'm still trying to work out how a large Park in a large town was so empty of people , it wasn't that late in the night , to what I've read it's not to best of places to be after dark , so now we are left with people that probably won't come forward, kids having a smoke, drugs, doging , or just a quick one with someone you meet earlier in the evening , late night dog walkers, most likely people did see things and won't come forward for many reasons ,just my opinion,
Not if it's in an attempt to save a life, which may apply here.
I just keep trying to understand how she would get from the bench area to the park in the car, I know it’s not far and she was drunk but her instinct would kick in pretty quickly that something was awry and she’d be screaming bloody murder before she got IN to the park. If she was ‘gagged’ in some way then why let her scream for 15 minutes and draw attention when you’ve gone to the trouble of getting her there as quietly as possible. JMO. Unless she was semi conscious or froze in terror I could supposeYeah it would back up the male voices!
I'm a bit doubtful about those park screams! If they kept everything in a small area it would make it hard to pick them up on any main Street CCTV. The police having such a small search area suggests they know she hasn't left the immediate area.
To be honest, what he is wearing reminds me of me now. Not long been in from work, had a shower, now watching telly in some shorts and a t shirt.?? What do you recon .....
Thank you for this. It’s haunting. Even if I knew nothing about the place, it just gives me that feeling I’ve had a few times inI've updated this post with time codes for the video with the relevant location on the map.
I agree it is possible he first told the wife and maybe she relayed it to his other relatives.
It makes sense because his wife was likely the first person he wanted to talk to in order to explain why he is not coming home.
I was more referring to his stanceTo be honest, what he is wearing reminds me of me now. Not long been in from work, had a shower, now watching telly in some shorts and a t shirt.
Now if my Mrs suddenly decided she wanted a take away or something from the shop I would just pop on my shoes and a fleece and off we go.
Or maybe my Mrs has been out at her mates and calls me to come and pick her up. Same thing.
What I’m trying to say is they don’t look like clothes you would wear if you were out unless it was a spur of the moment thing.
Sorry.I was more referring to his stance
I'm back guys! Walked maybe 8 miles to and from and through the park (Oak Rd) and south along the riverbank (downstream). I walked as far as I could get along that stretch of the river before the path became too overgrown, sloppy and tapered off towards the bridge over the dual carriageway near B&Q on Clough Road. I didn't really take many pics of the park itself tbh... there was nothing to see that hasn't already been documented by the Hull Daily Mail, etc. The pics are of the river areas and might help you all get a better feel for it. My boots and jeans are blathered in mud, lol! One thing - a spot on in the soil against the fence that separates the wind turbine from the river - caught my attention but it's probably nothing. Will come back in a bit...
that’s ok , if it didn’t strike you when you first looked at the photos it’s probably nothing .... it’s just me vivid imagination thinking they looked stood the sameSorry.
You're not alone on here on the faces front.I'm a numbers gal and rarely forget a date or phone number or numberplate. But faces and clothing descriptions? Nah, least observant person ever!
"I want the people of Hull to understand we just want to help. It was difficult at first because the time and date in the footage is incorrect and was showing up in March. "I was away at the weekend and the police came around for the CCTV footage this morning." Lukasz Rybus. Owner of the property next to Welly quoted from Feb12th HDM article re Welly cctvAh, I was so hung up on the time I didn't even look at the date.
Glad someone was paying attention.
Difficult to suss his body language out when he is looking down a lot at his press release to read out, and keep his hands neutral/non moving, but I did note when he talked about potentially jeopardising any future investigations he double blinks at the end of that sentence at 'future investigations' on that final word. I don't think he is hopeful of a future investigation....OR he doesn't think anything will jeopardise any future investigations OR he knows already that something out there already (the cobweb CCTV?) has already jeopardised any future investigations. I would say on balance its the last choice.
He does also double blink when at the end he says 'to call 101 and to help us find her.' He DB's on the call 101. I don't think he is expecting any new evidence to be phoned in, apart from a body appearing.
I conclude he is not at all hopeful of finding anything further out from the public. Oh my...poor Libby and her family.
the car expert on here told it’s a 100% fact it’s the same car , not a remote possibility of him being wrong he said
Ah okay, sorry. Thanks for correcting me. I actually remember reading those posts. Honestly, I was paying more attention to the movement in the car and the activity of the person/people on camera and trying to make some sense of what I could see.I agree the car in cctv is an Astra Mark 5 SXi