I’m glad that you have the experience in Crown Court trials in the UK to back me up on this because I wouldn’t want my fellow WSs to believe that this is the norm when it certainly is not and generally, most trials undertaken, operate at a much more professional level with a far greater degree of evidence given , which supports the charges levelled against the accused on the indictment . I think that public pressure and public interest in this vicious crime against a vulnerable female out walking in the middle of the day, daylight hours, has swayed the Police and CPS to bring the trial to court at a far earlier stage than would normally be done and unfortunately, as a result of this pressure, there has not been sufficient time to go down every route in order to obtain all the available evidence. I feel IMOO their judgement has been clouded by the weight of public pressure to take someone to Court and to reduce the anxiety and public perception of the fear of crime coming to fruition by saying that there is no need to worry because the perpetrator who committed this heinous act, has been apprehended and will be going away for a very long time....
Because we no longer have the laws against double jeopardy, if RM was to be found not guilty of the murder of LB, at least this way, IF NEW EVIDENCE was to come to light further down the line and IF CPS BELIEVE THAT IT IS IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST TO PROSECUTE FOR A SECOND TIME, then at least we get to do it again and have two bites of the cherry !