Found Deceased UK - Natasha Reddington-Romanov, 55, last seen leaving a night out in Soho, 20 Sep 2024

[Tortoise]

“Two of the bartenders from Trisha’s, who are close friends of ours, were waiting to get into the club, but there was quite a long line,” Kawalik said. “Natasha walked past and didn’t go into the club.”

RSBM

I think there is something about this statement which could signify this was unusual for her. Walking past close friends. JMO

 

[imstilla.grandma]

I am so sick and damn tired of all these beautiful women intentionally ending their lives, if this is what happened here, why Natasha? I'm so sorry, but why Natasha why?

 

[truthfinder2019]

Natasha Reddington-Romanov, 55, was last seen on September 20 and the Metropolitan Police said her body was found in the River Thames near Vauxhall Bridge today.

The Southwark resident's death is 'being treated as unexpected, but not suspicious', the force added, after friends feared she might have been targeted as a transgender woman.

Trans woman, 55, missing for more than a week is found dead in London

Natasha Reddington-Romanov, 55, a trans woman whose friends described her as an 'icon of Soho' has been found dead in London over a week after going missing.

www.dailymail.co.uk

To go home from Tricia’s in Soho, she would have taken the Golden Jubilee Bridge and go straight 1h walking to Old Kent rd.
Instead, she was found near the Vauxhall Bridge further down. So either the water brought her there, or ?
I would think that at that time of night, you just take the straight route

Straight route home via Golden Jubilee Bridge


Via Vauxhall Bridge


I suppose we will never know…

 

[Boots38]

How is it not suspicious? It seems to me she was walking home and then she was drowned in the river. Unless she was extremely intoxicated, which doesn’t seem to be the case from witness statements, I would think her death is suspicious. It at least seems quite early to say one way or another. MOO

Why would it be suspicious? She may be trans but I don't think that changes the fact that when an intoxicated man goes missing he's usually found in water nearby. I'm not being rude or mean so please Noone take it that way. I'm just trying to understand why it's different for this situation, any other time our mind goes straight to "they're in the water". MOO

 

[asmi106082]

Why would it be suspicious? She may be trans but I don't think that changes the fact that when an intoxicated man goes missing he's usually found in water nearby. I'm not being rude or mean so please Noone take it that way. I'm just trying to understand why it's different for this situation, any other time our mind goes straight to "they're in the water". MOO

I just thought it seemed a rush to judgment when they automatically said it wasn’t suspicious. I was hoping they didn’t just write it off as a suicide or misadventure due to the circumstances. I would’ve felt it a quick announcement whether the person was trans or not. MOO

 

[realanastasia]

Why would it be suspicious? She may be trans but I don't think that changes the fact that when an intoxicated man goes missing he's usually found in water nearby. I'm not being rude or mean so please Noone take it that way. I'm just trying to understand why it's different for this situation, any other time our mind goes straight to "they're in the water". MOO

In previous discussions of why it seems relatively common that missing young men (who are last seen walking, intoxicated, at night, near bodies of water) are found in the water, some have suggested that perhaps the men felt, uh, nature’s call, and went close to the water to relieve themselves without considering that they might lose their balance or stumble down a steep bank in the process, ending up in the water. The reason folks aren’t suggesting that in this case may be because it seems much less common for this chain of events to occur with intoxicated young women, who (for anatomical reasons) might not find it so quick and easy to relieve themselves into a body of water as might a person with male anatomy.

 

[Boots38]

In previous discussions of why it seems relatively common that missing young men (who are last seen walking, intoxicated, at night, near bodies of water) are found in the water, some have suggested that perhaps the men felt, uh, nature’s call, and went close to the water to relieve themselves without considering that they might lose their balance or stumble down a steep bank in the process, ending up in the water. The reason folks aren’t suggesting that in this case may be because it seems much less common for this chain of events to occur with intoxicated young women, who (for anatomical reasons) might not find it so quick and easy to relieve themselves into a body of water as might a person with male anatomy.

This isn't an intoxicated young women, despite what one identified as. I believe men only drown while peeing in water isn't completely true, just a theory. Like autistic children being drawn to water, male or female, it's like a magnetic pull ( only saying this because it's not like they look up closest body of water and go there) same with drunk men, they can be headed towards right direction and found dead in body of water in opposit direction. MOO

 

[Rikissa]

Why would it be suspicious? She may be trans but I don't think that changes the fact that when an intoxicated man goes missing he's usually found in water nearby. I'm not being rude or mean so please Noone take it that way. I'm just trying to understand why it's different for this situation, any other time our mind goes straight to "they're in the water". MOO

NRR was a transwoman (see post #1), but we don't know how much, or if any, gender-affirming surgery she had done. She may no longer had the ability to relieve herself like a man, and even if she was, if she was dressed in a skirt she would have to pull the skirt up, and would that be something she was to do in public?

 

[Boots38]

NRR was a transwoman (see post #1), but we don't know how much, or if any, gender-affirming surgery she had done. She may no longer had the ability to relieve herself like a man, and even if she was, if she was dressed in a skirt she would have to pull the skirt up, and would that be something she was to do in public?

NRR was wearing a white Chanel trouser suit. I've heard stories from people telling me about their drunk spouses male or female waking up during night a peeing in random places in the home with no recollection of doing so until told the next morning. It happens is all I'm saying when you gotta go you gotta go, especially when drinking. It was after 2am on a hour walk home, chances are no matter who we are talking about they needed to pee at some point and everything was likely closed being that time of day. Even woman would have to pee and more likely to stray from the beaten path to do so, behind a bush squatted down, out of view behind anything, and being a female myself having to quickly pull down pants and squat anywhere to pee stand back up pull up pants just as quickly can cause an intoxicated person to lose balance and if by a river then unfortunately risk going in the water. Men have it easier they just turn their back and go as long as their front side isn't in sight. Women must be out of sight from every angle. I camp alot so speaking alot from experience and also seeing other people camping who will open car door squat down and careless about anyone behind them. I mean we are all human right and if you gave to go you go, I'd say it's way less humiliating to squat somewhere then to accidentally wet yourself. I hope this was a horrible drunken accident and her last moments weren't being hurt by a stranger. More than likely it was exactly a scenario I explained and not suspicious.

MOO.