Given the lack of outcome, perhaps a wrong decision.No, Claudia Lawrence was never seen in the company of another person and that became a murder enquiry after 5 weeks.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Given the lack of outcome, perhaps a wrong decision.No, Claudia Lawrence was never seen in the company of another person and that became a murder enquiry after 5 weeks.
am not trying to ' shut it down' ( I posted several pix of 'a red vehicle' on Hall Lane yesterday, parked up on the other side of the old stone barn )I don't understand why people are trying to shut this down.
Police have said it's a line of enquiry they are looking into?
It's a valid topic.
The hundreds of cars they are referring to is most likely the drivers that used the main road,
which they have written letters to.
IMO
Yes it is only about 80 m - 100m bench and although not directly accessible (bushes separate it from the field) those bushes are probably free of leaves at this time of year and she might have followed her dog to the edge there. If the police have not searched it they probably have information not released as it seems obvious to search it
I'm staggered. It looks very easy to me . Is it more plausible to fall in a river from a field drown in 2 ft water and float to the irish sea?Yes. It would be pretty much impossible to get someone over that unless they were cooperating with you.
Can they not get that witness time from the phone?This is the timeline.
NOTHING has changed from the outset.
Timeline
8.26am- Nicola leaves her home address with her children
8.40am- Nicola drops the children off at school and has a brief conversation with another parent.
8.43am – Nicola walked along the path by the River Wyre towards the gate/bench into the lower field, having dropped her children off at school
8:47am (approximately) - A dog-walker – somebody who knows Nicola – saw her walking around the lower field with her dog. Their two dogs interacted briefly before the witness left the field via the river path
8.53am – She sent an email to her boss
8.59 am- She sent message to a friend
9.01am – She logged into a Teams call
9.10am (approximately) – A witness – somebody who knows Nicola – saw her on the upper field walking her dog, Willow. Work is ongoing today to establish exactly what time this was.
9.20- Her phone was back in the area of the bench
9.30am – The Teams call ended but Nicola stayed logged on
9.33am (approximately) – Nicola’s mobile phone and Willow were found at a bench by the river by another dog-walker.
Lancashire Constabulary - Latest update in search for Nicola Bulley
The latest news and information for Lancashire Constabularywww.lancashire.police.uk
This is the timeline.
NOTHING has changed from the outset.
Timeline
8.26am- Nicola leaves her home address with her children
8.40am- Nicola drops the children off at school and has a brief conversation with another parent.
8.43am – Nicola walked along the path by the River Wyre towards the gate/bench into the lower field, having dropped her children off at school
8:47am (approximately) - A dog-walker – somebody who knows Nicola – saw her walking around the lower field with her dog. Their two dogs interacted briefly before the witness left the field via the river path
8.53am – She sent an email to her boss
8.59 am- She sent message to a friend
9.01am – She logged into a Teams call
9.10am (approximately) – A witness – somebody who knows Nicola – saw her on the upper field walking her dog, Willow. Work is ongoing today to establish exactly what time this was.
9.20- Her phone was back in the area of the bench
9.30am – The Teams call ended but Nicola stayed logged on
9.33am (approximately) – Nicola’s mobile phone and Willow were found at a bench by the river by another dog-walker.
Lancashire Constabulary - Latest update in search for Nicola Bulley
The latest news and information for Lancashire Constabularywww.lancashire.police.uk
Are we looking at the right fence here. I am lost for wordsIve never tried but I would imagine it would be very hard.
Looking at photos from google maps it does look like there is a fence separating the Rowanwater site with lodges from the field which is mainly a wire fence along the field and near the river is a lap fence. I agree it would be virtually very hard to get across the lap fence but surely her crossing the wire fence area (maybe chasing dog) should not be discounted particularly as the obvious areas have been searched and we think nothing foundYes. It would be pretty much impossible to get someone over that unless they were cooperating with you.
Can they not tell from the phone if it was where the witness placed Nicola ?The entry at 9.10 has said "work is ongoing today to establish exactly what time this was" for many many days now !
Yes. IMO, the dog AND the phone. The phone because it is supposed to have remained on the bench from 9:20, connected to Teams. The dog because it’s what she was responsible for. As I’ve said previously it suggests an immediate intervention by NB, panic and leaving/ignoring phone, to tend to the dog in the immediate vicinity. Most other scenarios would involve picking up, or disturbing/grabbing, the phone. Springers love water, hedgerows, small animals and fowl.I've I've said from that start the dog is the key to this. It was off its lead which meant it could run anywhere. Nicola was on a call so didn't have her full attention on the dog.
I imagine so.Can they not get that witness time from the phone?
yes thanks for adding the extra - I'd missed the meaning ( so she was saying it to the girls)
btw
I saw the interview where Emma was asked if she had faith in the police and at first she said she didn't want to comment, then hesitates before saying some complimentary things. It's somewhere on this thread
Anyway, imo, they both believe she is alive, just from reading Paul Ansell's comments same day Nicola Bulley's partner says his family are going through 'hell'
This is exactly what I was saying a few days ago, MOO the timeline is dependent on a witness who can't be sure of the time that saw someone with the Willow that matched NB's description (but from far enough away that I don't believe it can be a positive id) and the person who "found the phone and Willow" who didn't actually report it till 10.45? Which means there is a period between 8.59 and 10.45 where she isn't positively accounted for.From todays Lancashire Police Timeline
Timeline
8.26am- Nicola leaves her home address with her children
8.40am- Nicola drops the children off at school and has a brief conversation with another parent.
8.43am – Nicola walked along the path by the River Wyre towards the gate/bench into the lower field, having dropped her children off at school
8:47am (approximately) - A dog-walker – somebody who knows Nicola – saw her walking around the lower field with her dog. Their two dogs interacted briefly before the witness left the field via the river path
8.53am – She sent an email to her boss
8.59 am- She sent message to a friend
9.01am – She logged into a Teams call
9.10am (approximately) – A witness – somebody who knows Nicola – saw her on the upper field walking her dog, Willow. Work is ongoing today to establish exactly what time this was.
9.20- Her phone was back in the area of the bench
9.30am – The Teams call ended but Nicola stayed logged on
9.33am (approximately) – Nicola’s mobile phone and Willow were found at a bench by the river by another dog-walker.
Why has the 9.33am entry become another dog walker when it has been stated multiple times (including press interviews) that one female person was simply walking and a second person (male) had a dog?
Is it any wonder people are questioning everything about this case when even the Police are for some reason not being crystal clear in an official timeline?
Well in that case I'd say it's very possible.When is that pic from? I heard from someone who lives in the area that that fence is no longer there.
I didn't know what Monte Carlo was - but it couldn't help at all, because knowing what happens most often is no use in ascertaining what happened in one individual instance.Usually not, IIRC. There is a book called The Perfect Storm which goes into some detail about what happens when someone drowns. I don't recall the percentages, but that author said that most who drown do so with no water in their lungs.
I said a few threads back, and others have said likewise, that the only way you could use mannequins would be in a sort of Monte Carlo way. Monte Carlo is a just a financial modelling term that means "simulate it a very large number of times and see what happens most often". The trouble is that doing so would take time, the more time elapses the more outcomes there are, and by the time you've got your Monte Carlo answer, all it tells you is where she was however long ago you did the exercise. If you somehow did it in real time to see where she gets to in two weeks, by the time you've established this two more weeks have passed so all you know is where she probably was two weeks ago.
The comparison with plastic ducks isn't valid IMO. Yes they end up all over place, but they're hardly in the water at all, they're on it rather than submerged, they can't go aground, most of them is exposed to wind, rain etc which are going to have a greater effect on a small thing than on a body, and in that photo, some will shelter others from the wind. But for practicality reasons I don't think it can work.
Given the lack of outcome, perhaps a wrong decision.
Nicola was on a conference call but not participating it seems, her video was turned off and she was on mute. I read she often used speakerphone when on calls.I've I've said from that start the dog is the key to this. It was off its lead which meant it could run anywhere. Nicola was on a call so didn't have her full attention on the dog.
Bit too dogmatic for me. Probably dead, but cause of death unknownDefinitely the right decision but 5 weeks too late to have any chance of success.