Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Its said that a witness saw her in the top field at 09.10. Does phone date confirm this position? If they can show where the phone was at 09.20 then they must be able to trace it there all the way from the carparkThis article doesn't make sense as I keep saying because they have the phone, they will know what route the phone took to the bench surely?
I don't understand the fascination with this 10 minute gap?
So what are everyone's thoughts on what information the police may have and are holding back that leads them to the river theory with no suspicious circumstances?
Are you assuming that is the same red van?So there is!
Visuals here, image data from google maps says 2023 too, so it looks to be recent satellite imagery.
View attachment 401871
View attachment 401872
In a case as serious as this (but where police strongly suspect crime) it is likely that they would seize the cctv recording unit itself for a more forensic type of examination. Unbeknown to many cctv system owners the recorder unit (DVR or NVR) carries a log of events that would record events such as a camera being added or removed from the system, alerts from cameras such as a line being crossed, a notification sent to the system owner etc. Currently the log is unable to identify how a camera may have been disabled (fault, cable cut, disconnected etc.) but the timing of the event could prove either suspicious or innocent depending on whether the camera simply and coincidentally failed or a cable fault could be construed as malicious or not as the case may be. Evidence from the hard drive / Cloud that stores the footage may add weight to this.Yes, that is the CCTV in the back field that isn't working.
My question is about the CCTV cameras on the Wyreside Cottage pictured in summer 2019. Do we know for sure *both* cameras are still up and these are definitely the cameras police have footage for?
Let's look at this hypothetically. I am not making any accusations but just trying to cover all areas. Say something happened outside my house, the police were involved and I didn't want them to see my footage for whatever reason, I could remove a camera with key details and they might not know I ever had it. To find me out we'd rely on previous Google footage/ photos or eyewitness accounts. In rural places it's less likely other locals are going to know exactly where cameras are and how many.
Serious question. How can a van look suspicious? What made the witnesses think it was suspicious.Tatty red van - second sighting ( paragraph two below for second witness)
It has now emerged that a concerned resident spotted a suspicious-looking vehicle, believed to be a Renault, outside a barn in St Michael's on Wyre, Lancashire, on January 27. The witness contacted the police to report a suspicious "red van" parked in the village close to where Bulley went missing.
The 55-year-old witness, who had not been named, told the Times they saw the "tatty red van in Hall Lane outside a barn".
“I didn’t think anything at the time, but when I saw Nicola had gone missing, I called 101 and spoke to an operator. “I contacted the police again on Friday and spoke to a police officer. It could have been a Renault van."
The St Michaels on Wyre resident said the vehicle was the "sort of van you can live in".
A second witness - who happens to work in in search and rescue in the south of the country - revealed to The Sun that they had seen a red van which "looked suspicious" at 9.40am that morning. The man, who requested not to be named, said they had called the police three days after she was revealed missing when they realised that the vehicle "might be significant" in their inquiries.
"They thanked me and asked if I had any dashcam footage and told me they were taking my information seriously", he added. Police searching for Nicola Bulley have been told about new ‘tatty red van’ lead
bit more on that second witness, cause quite a few of the other newspapers had ommitted this line, which, I thought was interesting ( But I'm terrible when I start to see recurring themes, am like a dog with a bone)
“The call really allayed my fears that my sighting wouldn’t be considered properly, they are obviously following up on everything.” Lancashire Police said they had no comment to make regarding the suspicious red van.Nicola cops ARE hunting shabby red van - I saw the vehicle, says key witness
This was my first thought. They were quick to say no third party criminal activity but they haven’t immediately shut down talk of the van.Very interesting that the Lanc Police said no comment re: the van.
Every other suggestion has been shot down immediately.
Suggests that they are still looking into it IMO
Also, what concerned me was, imagine a scenario where the red van driver is the perp in this case.Serious question. How can a van look suspicious? What made the witnesses think it was suspicious.
In a case as serious as this (but where police strongly suspect crime) it is likely that they would seize the cctv recording unit itself for a more forensic type of examination. Unbeknown to many cctv system owners the recorder unit (DVR or NVR) carries a log of events that would record events such as a camera being added or removed from the system, alerts from cameras such as a line being crossed, a notification sent to the system owner etc. Currently the log is unable to identify how a camera may have been disabled (fault, cable cut, disconnected etc.) but the timing of the event could prove either suspicious or innocent depending on whether the camera simply and coincidentally failed or a cable fault could be construed as malicious or not as the case may be. Evidence from the hard drive / Cloud that stores the footage may add weight to this.
The St Michaels on Wyre resident said the vehicle was the "sort of van you can live in".Serious question. How can a van look suspicious? What made the witnesses think it was suspicious.
Yes I don't I understand why the witnesses felt the need to contact the papers. Do they expect police have the time to contact everyone who phones in with a tip and give them an update?Also, what concerned me was, imagine a scenario where the red van driver is the perp in this case.
If all the witnesses, after telling LE, then go off and speak to different newspapers, what do you imagine a perp might do next?
A lot of Sarah Everard’s case relied on random dashcam/bus cam/doorbell footage too, didn’t it? That led to the car, which led to LE tracking journey, which led to her location. (If I recall correctly.)Libby Squire also springs to mind. If she had not been seen getting into the perp's car (almost never happened was only *just* caught on CCTV and the car, because of thag, had not then been followed by ANPR and public cameras to the riverbank it would have been a different story.
If she had just washed up in the Humber weeks later, without the CCTV or DNA evidence (miraculous the abduction was caught on CCTV and the DNA evidence survived all those weeks in water), it would have been assumed she wandered to the river drunk and fell in or went in of her own accord. And we'd have a dangerous murderer still walking the streets.
Suddenly disposing of your red van, after the headlines, would raise police suspicions even more now, wouldn't it?Yes I don't I understand why the witnesses felt the need to contact the papers. Do they expect police have the time to contact everyone who phones in with a tip and give them an update?
so could just belong to whoever lives there surely?Are you assuming that is the same red van?
In the second image the red 'van' appears to have a horse box or alike hitched to the rear of it.