I stand by the work of the police and believe that everything they do, and the information they do and don't release is for a reason. I also believe in their expertise, or that they call in expertise where needed. I don't think any feasible line of enquiry will be overlooked or ignored.
In the absence of evidence I still don't know which way I think. Previously it was river accident, now for me seeming less likely in the absence of any evidence coming forward. Leaning now more towards abduction, that could change again.
@Woodburnbay #931 mentioned options for exiting a person via the caravan site. It seems to me there are other secluded/non CCTV options if not taking a footpath route in such a rural location.
Some random thoughts - all just MOO - are:
- The river search wasn't ever just a search for a body but a search for any other evidence to back up another line of enquiry. The high profile of the river search could have been to take focus away from other lines of enquiry.
- Stalker or threat history - not something that has been disclosed or would be disclosed. Close family could be aware of but told not to disclose. Speed of police response, and PA's concern, could be linked to history not made public.
- Willow - could have been deliberately distracted or temporarily restrained (even drugged?) in a planned abduction.
- Use of threat/weapon to get a person out of an area quickly and quietly seems all too feasible to me.