We don’t know she was drinking that day.Someone drinking would tend to walk more slowly.
We don’t know she was drinking that day.Someone drinking would tend to walk more slowly.
I doubt if POA is relevant in this case as we can assume that as neither PA or NB have any issues with mental capacity to make their own decisions (financial or medical) they probably wouldn't have ever addressed the matter.
The self-referral to the IOPC is mandatory. Whenever a person dies or is seriously injured, or is in a serious incident, such as the current one, and police have had any recent contact with them, a referral has to be made. A typical example is where a person is arrested under suspicion of a sex offence, and then jumps off a bridge a day or two after release. Or a domestic violence victim is killed, when police have attended the address previously.It's going to be interesting to see the IOPC report on this one. ( self referral)
If they did release it under pressure from media I'd liked to read about that in the report too ( Mark William's Thomas call to LP to release what he'd scooped about the police call to the home)
If Home Sec wanted to she could ask for a full review from His Majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary - I bet she doesn't.
I hope that the lower ranks won't get the blame and have their career's affected because that U turn was clearly made over the head of the SIO
This is true however the LE have announced that she had problems with alcohol. I:m an alcoholic myself although never touch the strong stuff and I don't hide it.We don’t know she was drinking that day.
Or it might just be that they want to cling on to the most hopeful possibility."not be scared"
"time to come home now."
The phrasing makes it sound as if these family members believe that NB has left voluntarily ( Mum/Dad/Sister)
I see that scenario all the time. That bank is steep and slippery.Hi we have similar theories. I have a mental health background and re Jan 10th was reminded of an incident which I attended along with police and health professionals due to concerns about one of my clients. As for the initial statement that NB was vulnerable, we already know that this came after a former detective Mark Williams Thomas found out about the incident and contacted Police saying he had details (discussed earlier with a link).
Of course none of this might have any bearing on what happened or it simply might be she wasn't as focussed as usual. I can see a scenario where she put her phone down and got up off the bench to grab Willow and put her harness on. She may have stumbled and gone down head first. The harness was found on the slope. Maybe she kocked her head or got cold water shock.
But just one of several possibilities imo
I hope for the family's sake we learn something soon.
I see that scenario all the time. That bank is steep and slippery.
Harness was on slope (link posted in early threads). She might have been trying to put it on and stumbled. She would have needed both hands so it makes sense imo that she put the phone down first.That has definitely crossed my mind a few times. I still wonder why his harness was between the bench and river though.
It may be useful to have a sketched plan (birds eye view) of where the phone, lead and harness were found in relation to the bench. It could be quite revealing!That has definitely crossed my mind a few times. I still wonder why his harness was between the bench and river though.
The local may be considered an accomplice in her disappearance rather than some predator - eg a friend who is helping her escape from her situation.
I've bolded a sentence of your post because it's quite correct. This was the sort of decision which would usually be run past the Head of Legal Services, because it's so contentious. The Senior Leadership Team and Command Team wouldn't be likely to dare to put out such a statement without having all Ps and Qs checked, in my opinion.As you say we don't have all the information they have - but in terms of releasing the information prior/ahead of the press releasing it - they still need to have a lawful basis to release the information. Police can release personal data in order to investigate a crime and protect the public - personally I can't see how releasing information to pre-empt a story released by the press falls under either purpose? I would imagine that the Police have a legal support team and access to expertise that could have advised them.
Lancs Police will have to justify and explain their decision making process to the Information Commissioner's Office and imo it's good that the ICO have published a statement today stating they've asked for this explanation.
And again menopause systems, HRT treatment and "significant" alcholol problems are very explicit and detailed - any health and medical data including mental health data is special category (sensitive) personal data. They could have simply said there were ongoing health and medical issues without providing the level of detail that they did.
This is true however the LE have announced that she had problems with alcohol. I:m an alcoholic myself although never touch the strong stuff and I don't hide it.
The fact the missing person had problems with alcohol is general knowledge. The only way to find out if someone was drinking at a certain time is with either breath or blood tests. Absent the missing person neither of these can be carried out.
IMO it is entirely plausible she could have been consuming strong drink and this could be related to the disappearance.
Penny said she had to get back for an appointment so she wouldn't have stayed with Willow. I haven't seen it mentioned anywhere if the gentleman witness on sky news stayed with Willow just that his wife phoned him while he was at the bench after having been phoned by Penny. That's what I picked up from the sky live witness appearance today.Paul said he phoned LP at 10.50am and that when he got to bench, probs about 10 mins later (from home to bench) there were dog walkers there who handed him Willow & NB phone. If the guy & Penny found Willow at 9.30am then that’s an hour & half waiting with the dog.
Ahh, all my family have LPAs already set up (and I'm in my early 30s), so I may have over-estimated the likelihood of PA and NB having PoAs set up for each other.
<bbm>I think MWT is implying that it was the Jan 10th event that would have been reported on. If the press couldn’t have included any more info than that the police and an ambulance were there, due to not being able to report on medical/psychological issues, it would have raised further unnecessary questions, suspicion, conspiracy theories, and hurt for the family.
edit: sorry, much the same was already said, didn’t realise how many pages of the thread had already come after that I hadn’t got to yet!