What we know now is that he is not POI.I
a general query about POI… when a person becomes a poi .. do the public get to know this? When would we know. Why would the police publish who are poi?
Sorry just wondering..
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What we know now is that he is not POI.I
a general query about POI… when a person becomes a poi .. do the public get to know this? When would we know. Why would the police publish who are poi?
Sorry just wondering..
This line of talk can only go south, IMO.I don’t think that is known or has been published.
I said 'I think' not 'I know'. My understanding from what I've read so far.how do you know? I don't think that info has ever been made known
Yes, the use of the word' back' was a slight sloppiness of speech, I thought; and I imagine it was because the bench was in the vicinity of the gate she'd entered by.Unless I missed something, LE specifically said "the mobile phone was back on the bench at 9:20 am"
Always intrigued by the "back on the bench" which infers it was there previously but may just be semantics.
Whichever, it only states the location of the mobile phone and not NB which is more significant.
I'm guessing now but something gave some location data from the phone, just guessing but no idea really, maybe "find my" enabled in an iPhone, for example, confirmed that location at that time.
Maybe, if they can pinpoint location so accurately, NB was sitting on the bench taking the call (or that’s the assumption), then they know she walked around, then the phone was left on the bench by itself?
I’ve just finished PF’s book. Obviously it is his own life story etc but he comes across as very empathetic and has a great deal of experience, including the spy in the bag case and numerous cases involving caving / diving. I was genuinely surprised, as I thought the book would be far more of an ego trip, but it’s actually pretty nuanced.He also said it was about a foot higher than on the day of his searching so it does seem possible there would have been some flow. It is only a small river and a foot extra is quite a significant amount of water.
ETA link
Diving expert claims video proves Nicola Bulley didn't fall into river
Peter Faulding and his team were called in by her family to help with the search.metro.co.uk
PF of all people will definitely know what he is talking about with regards to river searches. He's a dive
In one of the LP press conferences they stated clearly that they had been able to place the phone exactly because of the massive amount of work that the technicians have carried out on it. For obvious reasons most of the techniques and tools that are deployed by police special investigators and technicians are treated as sensitive and aren't disclosed.GPS data isn't that accurate. Even looking at my own phone now on Find My it moves around a bit despite it being sat on the table. IMO
What do you mean 'guff people spout'? lol It's really not unusual for people to have a work mobile and a personal mobile.I work in finance and only have one phone.
Honestly, the guff people spout on here, fs.
What have you read so far that gives you an understanding of who was at the meeting? I'm not finding any information that states that.I said 'I think' not 'I know'. My understanding from what I've read so far.
Doesn't PA also work from home? Having an in-person meeting at home while someone else is also trying to work might be disturbing.And she maybe didn't want him at her house, or he didn't want to go to her house.
I wouldn't read too much into any of this, sometimes I email my boss 10-20 times a day, sometimes 1 per week, which means nothing.
In one of the LP press conferences they stated clearly that they had been able to place the phone exactly because of the massive amount of work that the technicians have carried out on it. For obvious reasons most of the techniques and tools that are deployed by police special investigators and technicians are treated as sensitive and aren't disclosed.
What have you read so far that gives you an understanding of who was at the meeting? I'm not finding any information that states that.
Indoors isn't as accurate as outdoors. Where NB's phone was last found was a nice clear outdoor area with no obstructions to receiving data from the GPS satellites so could be as accurate as 5 metres.GPS data isn't that accurate. Even looking at my own phone now on Find My it moves around a bit despite it being sat on the table. IMO
There's nothing secret about the data available from a mobile phone, the tools and techniques are well-known among tech circles.In one of the LP press conferences they stated clearly that they had been able to place the phone exactly because of the massive amount of work that the technicians have carried out on it. For obvious reasons most of the techniques and tools that are deployed by police special investigators and technicians are treated as sensitive and aren't disclosed.
I made that assumption too for some reason… I can’t think why now.I took it to mean one-to-one. That is all.
Missing Nicola Bulley's mum and dad fear 'somebody has got her'
Nicola, a dog walker, went missing on Friday along a river towpath in Lancashire.www.birminghammail.co.uk
Sorry I'm confused about this. I thought it was a lady from the caravan park who found the dog and phone. Is this a second person who found it, if so at What time, did he check the river for a missing dog owner and was the dog there?UPDATED: 12:33 EST, 17 February 2023Dog walker reveals moment he found Nicola Bulley's phone on bench
A dogwalker who found missing Nicola Bulley's phone thought 'this is not right'.www.dailymail.co.uk
''A dogwalker who found missing Nicola Bulley's phone came forward today and revealed how he thought, 'this is not right'.
The man, who said he was called Ron, went public this morning three weeks after the mortgage adviser vanished in St Michael's on Wyre.
In an extraordinary coincidence he appeared on television walking his dog as Sky News recreated 45-year-old Ms Bulley's own walk.''
'He confirmed he had given a full statement to the police after finding Ms Bulley's phone on the bench at around 9.30am on January 27.'' rbbm
He said: 'Each day something new comes out doesn't it.'
''He didn't know Ms Bulley but recognised her dog Willow.
'I'd seen both owners of Willow walking this dog in the past, but while I knew their faces I didn't know their names,' he said.
Ron added that when he first found the phone he thought 'somebody had gone to toilet'.
He added: 'I got to about this red brick building here and I thought 'this is not right'.
'Then it was just a progression of things happening, you know. Because of the wallpaper on the phone we found out who the couple were, and the school was contacted and Paul arrived.'
View attachment 403492
In an extraordinary coincidence Ron appeared on television walking his dog as Sky News recreated Ms Bulley's walk.
Maybe because her dad said she went to meet her boss, and then we imagined those two only.I made that assumption too for some reason… I can’t think why now.
From the article you linked are the answers:Sorry I'm confused about this. I thought it was a lady from the caravan park who found the dog and phone. Is this a second person who found it, if so at What time, did he check the river for a missing dog owner and was the dog there?