Libby Squire
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Libby Squire
Ive not been in here for a few days. Has there been another press conference or are you referring to the one several days ago?
I thought she said she saw he 10 minutes before & the two dogs acknowledged each other
Hopefully the family would know with certainty how many sets she owned, though this seems unlikely to me.Thinking about it, surely they would be able to locate her earphones at her home/car etc to determine if she did not have them on her that morning? It would be quite an easy way to rule it out and IMO is why they haven't mentioned the possibility of her having them on her persons that day
In my opinion the phone being at the bench at 9.20 doesn’t mean Nicola went to the bench. The person finding the phone at 9.33 doesn’t mean she had already gone into the water. Surely they would not be giving this 10 minute window based on just guesswork?The police have no information from the Fitbit it and not synced with the phone for 4 days.
They have given that 10 min window because they say she was seen at 9:10, they believe she was at the bench at 9:20 because of phone gps, and someone found the dog around 9:30 with no sign of Nicola
it's hard to accept we could die at any time due to a split second decision or being in the wrong place at the wrong time. We want it to make sense in our minds. Feel like we have control over our destiny unfortunately we don't. They need it to be the "bad guy" or similar.Because mis-adventure is a hard pill to swallow...it always feels majorly avoidable and is just a little "Final Destination"
Think of similar cases of misadventure that were confirmed as such that could have ended SO differently had there been one small difference. It's tough to accept, so we reach.
Well this has just turned my head again. After hearing PF speak there I’m back to not in the river. I really don’t know anymore.
No mention of harness being wet.I would be surprised if harness used as a toy JMOMy theory was that the dog may have become bored by the MP doing the online conference thing and may have started to seek a play toy. It isn't impossible that a dog harness could be used as a toy. This is a bit out of the ordinary type of systemising but to me it seems plausible the harness was thrown for the dog as a retrieval toy of some sort. It ended up in the water and the owner put the phone down on the bench to go and get the harness back.
I feel it is important to take into account the fact the MP was doing something with the phone. This takes attention away from the dog. I've had dogs in the past (lurchers not spaniels) they do like attention.
There was also a report of the MP being in a jovial mood when seen by a witness. This could be to do with having a good time playing with the dog.
All MOO and just theories.
Of course if the police could confirm the status of the harness when found my theories can be discounted easily. As far as I know there has been no mention of this detail.
thank youGarstang Lane is the riverside path leading to the inner/upper field it's not a road. You won't find it on Google Maps. That's the mistake I was making. But if you listen to SI Riley she clearly said Garstang leading to A 586. Garstang Lane is the red dotted line on the screenshot provided.
I wonder this. And was he accompanied to do so? Seems a random place to go and search in an entirely different area to where she was seen, abandoned house or not, you’d have to have very local knowledge to know that was there unlike the one over the river. So if he thinks this is a good place to look, why haven't police as well…Why did PA check ivy dene building before meeting at the village hall for the search ?
Maybe the dog dumped the harness in the river or dangled it half in.My theory was that the dog may have become bored by the MP doing the online conference thing and may have started to seek a play toy. It isn't impossible that a dog harness could be used as a toy. This is a bit out of the ordinary type of systemising but to me it seems plausible the harness was thrown for the dog as a retrieval toy of some sort. It ended up in the water and the owner put the phone down on the bench to go and get the harness back.
I feel it is important to take into account the fact the MP was doing something with the phone. This takes attention away from the dog. I've had dogs in the past (lurchers not spaniels) they do like attention.
There was also a report of the MP being in a jovial mood when seen by a witness. This could be to do with having a good time playing with the dog.
All MOO and just theories.
Of course if the police could confirm the status of the harness when found my theories can be discounted easily. As far as I know there has been no mention of this detail.