EyeSpyU
Former Member
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2019
- Messages
- 311
- Reaction score
- 1,302
Obviously they did - which is how the knew it wasn’t working.The police looked at it?
But my point was: a would-be abductor wouldn’t know it wasn’t working…
Obviously they did - which is how the knew it wasn’t working.The police looked at it?
Police haven’t suggested that, that suggestion came from the entrepreneur whose company helped with the search, before he had agreed to help assist the search.police have suggested the phone left on the seat may be a decoy, if they are saying there is no other person and she is possibly in the water, are they suggesting she may have intended to disappear?
Couldn't she swim to safety, and was she swept out to sea? As the hunt for missing Nicola Bulley continues, the 10 questions that remain unanswered
The search for Nicola Bulley has entered its 14th day with her devastated family still no closer to knowing what happened to the missing mother-of-two. Yesterday diving expert Peter Faulding halted his search of the River Wyre near to where Ms Bulley's mobile phone was found and does not believe she fell into the water. Police, meanwhile, believe that is still the most likely scenario but say it remained a 'possibility' that the 45-year-old left the area by one path not covered by CCTV cameras - but added that 'every single' suspicion or criminal suggestion had so far been discounted. Here we look at 10 unanswered questions...
Questions that remain unanswered as hunt for Nicola Bulley continues
Nicola Bulley vanished while walking her dog Willow along the River Wyre in Lancashire on January 27. These are some of the key questions that still need to be addressed.www.dailymail.co.uk
Obviously they did - which is how the knew it wasn’t working.
But my point was: a would-be abductor wouldn’t know it wasn’t working…
Unless the potential abductor lived on the caravan site and stopped it working himself.
I wonder how many permanent residents this caravan site has?
I tend to agree about the ‘people want to make this case something it’s not’ but with absolutely no evidence to say she went in the river and even the ‘experts’ questioning it, I can see where they are coming from.I think for the dive team to stop their searches now because they haven’t found anything is kind of ridiculous. After almost two weeks missing, NB could have floated miles downstream. And now for experts to be saying she might not even be in the water at all is crazy. From what I’ve been seeing online, people want to make this case something it’s not, and it’s sad.
MOO
I didn’t see mention of the Cartford Inn, though very happy to accept I may have missed it. Could you say what the relevance is?Just reposting this in case someone has read anything about it? It was mentioned yesterday in the press conference.
Probably notObviously they did - which is how the knew it wasn’t working.
But my point was: a would-be abductor wouldn’t know it wasn’t working…
Disagree honestly, I think tying someone else’s dog to a bench and leaving it for an hour is inexplicable.
what evidence would you need?I tend to agree about the ‘people want to make this case something it’s not’ but with absolutely no evidence to say she went in the river and even the ‘experts’ questioning it, I can see where they are coming from.
Guess time will tell