Marantz4250b
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 23, 2020
- Messages
- 2,690
- Reaction score
- 13,430
I entirely agree here. I have to say that I don't find anything strange in the texts at all. They seem very normal conversations to have given the circumstances and they certainly don't give the impression of her fishing for attention or sympathy.It’s interesting to try and read these messages with a neutral mind. The Prosecution presumably want to paint a picture of her being overly-concerned or fishing for attention, and they certainly can lend themselves to that sort of interpretation.
But I wonder, if we were seeing these messages out of this context - not knowing that they were sent by a nurse accused of murdering children - if people would still see them as sinister. Or whether it might seem quite normal for somebody to be reaching out to her friends when struggling with a really hard week at work, and quite appropriate that she kept remembering that the parents’ pain was far more than her own.
To me personally, this is a bit of a problem with a lot of the LL-specific evidence so far in this case. The note, the FB searches, the slightly off comments to parents - all of these things could be entirely innocent acts.
If any members of the Jury have done similar things - repeat searched clients on Facebook, documented their panicked thoughts, said the wrong thing in a hard moment at work - they’re likely to take the more sympathetic interpretation.
FWIW I still have no strong opinion as to the guilt of the accused. It really does feel far too early to say.
The FB searching I don't find strange, to be honest. Some people just have a need to know things and can't mentally put something "to bed" otherwise. I can entirely understand why she may have made these searches and even more so now that we've actually seen messages from her expressing concern for the parents.