UK - Nurse Lucy Letby, murder of babies, 7 Guilty of murder verdicts; 8 Guilty of attempted murder; 2 Not Guilty of attempted; 5 hung re attempted #35

[Dotta]

I don't think it's quite the bombshell they are implying. In fact, the corrected timings work far better - unsurprisingly!
As for the other cases, I'm not sure the door swipe data (even if incorrect) is significant for any of them. There may be one or two, but my recollection is that there is no doubt LL was on the unit, certainly for the majority. Obviously the insulin cases are different anyway.
All JMO.

I disagree.
Mistakes in evidence are worrying -
generally speaking as in any case.
They cause mistrust.
I would never treat them in nonchalant way.

JMO

 

[marynnu]

I disagree.
Mistakes in evidence are worrying -
generally speaking as in any case.
They cause mistrust.
I would never treat them in nonchalant way.

JMO

I'm not being nonchalant. Obviously it's a really bad error. But in the wider scheme of things it changes absolutely nothing. If it did I'm sure Ben Myers would have been all over it.
We should actually be reassured rather than losing trust, in that it came to light and has been acknowledged.

 

[Dotta]

I'm not being nonchalant. Obviously it's a really bad error. But in the wider scheme of things it changes absolutely nothing. If it did I'm sure Ben Myers would have been all over it.
We should actually be reassured rather than losing trust, in that it came to light and has been acknowledged.

It is worrying it did not come to light during original trial.

 

[marynnu]

It is worrying it did not come to light during original trial.

True, it should have been spotted.

 

[Anxala]

I'm not being nonchalant. Obviously it's a really bad error. But in the wider scheme of things it changes absolutely nothing. If it did I'm sure Ben Myers would have been all over it.
We should actually be reassured rather than losing trust, in that it came to light and has been acknowledged.

As you say, it changes absolutely nothing.

It's interesting with all these new theories, speculations, occasions of error etc that no one has yet challenged the actual evidence against Lucy Letby herself. They all seem happy to continue to circle around if not actually completely avoid the elephant in the room that she and her own words, deeds and actions is. Instead, all we're getting continues to be concerns in a vacuum. It's, to say the absolute least, dishonest and irresponsible.

The media that are giving a platform to the miscarriage of justice narrative need to step up and follow through on the investigative job they claim they're there to do. Either paint the full picture or just stop with what is now imo borderline clickbait.

 

[Dotta]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1826001264452210948

Documentary covering trial of child serial killer Lucy Letby to air on Channel 4

Letby’s trial ran for 10 months from October 2022 to August 2023.

www.standard.co.uk

 

[katydid23]

I KNEW a documentary would hit the airwaves soon. And unfortunately, I think it will be misleading and distorted. Perfect clickbait if they can point out all the details pointing to hr being a victim here.

I hope I am wrong.

 

[Parker Knoll]

The door swipe data was addressed at the re trial and BM accepted it was an innocent mistake so absolutely nothing to see here.
Just wild headlines for click bait.

 

[Dotta]

The door swipe data was addressed at the re trial and BM accepted it was an innocent mistake so absolutely nothing to see here.
Just wild headlines for click bait.

But the fuel for LL's advocates.

Mistakes in evidence are not "nothing to see here."

They indicate chaos and are worrying IMO.
Just speaking generally.
Nobody wants to be accused by "mistakes in evidence", right?

JMO

 

[Tortoise]

The door swipe data was addressed at the re trial and BM accepted it was an innocent mistake so absolutely nothing to see here.
Just wild headlines for click bait.

I'm certain I read about this before this week, much closer in time to the retrial or the appeal, because I remember thinking it had been accepted by the defence as a non-issue. But I can't find what it was that I read.

 

[Parker Knoll]

It was during the re trial I’m sure (ish)
Will have a dig about.