https://au.news.yahoo.com/a/23899417/prosecutor-grills-harris-over-affair/
Wass does a better (and way less tacky) job of seeing through Rolf's 'caring' facade to the man he really is when it comes to relationships and his attitude toward women:
Ms Wass claimed the 84-year-old had tailored his entire case around a letter he wrote to the alleged victim's father in 1997 apologising for his behaviour.
"You've given away rather too much in this letter," the prosecutor said, adding it didn't make sense if the pair had had a consensual relationship.
In the letter, previously read out in court, Harris said he'd asked the alleged victim: "Why did you never just say no?"
Ms Wass said that was an odd thing to say "if she was the person throwing herself at you".
Why hadn't the TV presenter stated in the letter that the complainant instigated the sexual encounters, she demanded to know.
---
Good point, actually. Who would ask a sexually aggressive woman 'why did you never say no?'. However - that said - I somehow doubt a man would write in a letter to a former friend, admitting he's had sex with the man's daughter like a dirty old lech, "By the way, she started it" if the point was to make some kind of amends.
Still. "Why did you never say no". It's something to ask a person who was compliant, not an aggressor.
___
Harris on Wednesday admitted the pair "hardly ever spoke", even when they went on a walk near his home and, according to the entertainer, she performed oral sex on him in public.
"Did you treat her as a human being at all?" the prosecutor asked.
"There wasn't a friendship at all," she continued.
"She was just there for sex (even) on your account."
To that Harris admitted: "It would seem so."
_____
Again, Wass pinpoints the problem with fluency in Rolf's story VS Rolf's actions. He's saying it was all mutual, he was seduced by a sexually aggressive young woman and, being a terrible sinner, gave in to her and they then embarked on this 'loving' affair. I don't think it was 'friendly' or 'loving' in the way he wants it seen, at all.
But I tend to believe him when he says it was less than a dozen encounters in 11 years. Rolf and his family moved quite some distance from Bindi's Friend (I'll call her BF) when the girls were still quite young. Given the distance, she could not have had frequent contact with the Harrises over the ensuing years - a couple of visits a year at most.
I also tend to believe that the affair didn't start until the high end of her teenage years. Not 18, though. I think it started a couple years at least prior to that.
However, I seriously doubt the allegations of molestation at 13 as well. I think BF has every reason to want to Rolf to suffer. He used her for casual sex, then dumped her like an old tissue when he found a newer, more handily available substitute. BF does not strike me as the most stable of personalities, and the way she confronted Bindi tends to look a bit vindictive, after Bind mentioned boatshed woman.
Remember, this 'victim' was 29 years old at the time, and had just been replaced, and had been refused a wack of guilt-money to boot.
That said, I think the reality was that BF -was- vulnerable as a young woman, for whatever existing reason, and when Rolf came onto her like an opportunistic old sociopath, she responded. And kept responding, until she was nearly 30, when the opportunity arose.
Rolf's treatment of her was ruthless. Like his treatment of boatshed woman. Like his treatment of his wife who's wrong in the head for staying with him, IMO. And of their poor daughter, who's spent her whole life feeling resentful, embarrassed and overlooked while the rest of the world adored him.