Anne Geddes never showed genitals or nipples of boy or girls.
I know someone who was on a jury for a sex offence. The victim must describe in front of a jury and the accused EVERYTHING. Go the victims! But in honesty, it is not a glossy magazine article.
Are you saying RH was tipped to police? I know that mud sticks but why would prosecutors press forward with trumped up charges?
Just why?
Who knows?
They arrested Jim Davidson too, then released him without charge.
That fact right there tells me, someone's overreacting to something, somewhere, in Operation Yewtree...or is that, Operation Youtoo?
The women's story must be believable enough to LE to think there's something to it. They have to investigate allegations, then they are obliged to bring charges if they feel the allegations have substance.
However, having had recent and unfortunate experiences with LE myself, I am very dubious as to their common sense levels and their desire to prosecute at all costs.
Police prosecutors, in my experience, prosecute. It's what they do.
In my case, evidence was not required to prosecute, nor even witness statements. They just mowed on with the prosecution regardless, performed an illegal arrest, then adjourned, adjourned, adjourned, because they haven't got any evidence.
It's still ongoing, on my 9th adjournment and it will probably be dropped now I've finally got a lawyer. At the very least, it will be dismissed by the courts as LE have actually acted illegally all the way through, including at court. Bozos.
My name is smeared, my time has been wasted, it's cost me big money, and you all reading this probably think "yeah right, didn't happen" and that I got arrested and charged because I did something wrong. Not true!
LE have a credibility that in my case at least, they absolutely don't deserve. The UK police aren't exactly shining examples of integrity or infallibility either, in my opinion.
:dunno: