Smithpanes
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2020
- Messages
- 177
- Reaction score
- 1,368
Bite me Dotta!I like your way of thinking
What does this "don't BM" mean?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Bite me Dotta!I like your way of thinking
What does this "don't BM" mean?
I suspect once the full story emerges death could and should have been prevented, sadly justice won't alter that.imo.Justice is coming Sara.
You are so rightI suspect once the full story emerges death could and should have been prevented, sadly justice won't alter that.imo.
I keep going back to the scenario described by the mother of a former school friend of Sara turning up at school with visible head and neck injuries (explained away by a ‘fall from a bike’) and never being seen again because she was removed for ‘home schooling’ the next day. If that is an accurate description of how things happened then that is surely a huge waving child safeguarding red flag which appears to have been totally ignored. Tragic.I suspect once the full story emerges death could and should have been prevented, sadly justice won't alter that.imo.
They have had a month in hiding to corroborate their stories with each other. They have had time to coach the kids on what to say and not say (IMOO).I was not expecting charges to be made so soon I wonder if they will all plead guilty so there will not be a trial.
They have had a month in hiding to corroborate their stories with each other. They have had time to coach the kids on what to say and not say (IMOO).
Considering the 3 of them think of Sara's death as a mere "incident", I dont believe they will plead guilty! (again, MOO)
I think that the children (who are old enough) may well be the source of truth, sadly.
What worries me is that the police referred to the enquiry as "complex". I would have thought it was straightforward... where is the complexity coming from? Is there something more that we , as public, are not aware of?
JMOO
Another similarity to Logan's case was that a victim was biracial.A post-mortem examination showed the schoolgirl had suffered “multiple and extensive injuries” over a “sustained and extended period of time”.
A cause of death is still to be established. It is understood that not one single “catastrophic injury” is responsible.
Sara Sharif's father among three adults charged with murder
Urfan Sharif was arrested over the death of his 10-year-old daughter alongside his partner Beinash Batool and brother Faisal Malikwww.telegraph.co.uk
Logan Mwangi again
I keep thinking of the 'letter' left near Sara (unconfirmed by the Police). It may not even exist. BUT if it does, this may add to the complexity of the case. Especially if it was 'supposedly' written by Sara's brother.I think the complex part will be trying to prove which of them caused the fatal injury - and - as I've just posted in the link above - the PM has already ascertained that no one single blow was the cause of death.
In addition, having to ask young children to provide information against their parents and relatives could also be considered complex and difficult.
Just MOO of course
If there is a letter and is used against them, at some stage they will or their legal team will be shown it as part of the disclosure process.I keep thinking of the 'letter' left near Sara (unconfirmed by the Police). It may not even exist. BUT if it does, this may add to the complexity of the case. Especially if it was 'supposedly' written by Sara's brother.
IF it's genuine, do the 3 charged persons know the contents of the letter in full? Are some (rather than all) of them even aware of it? Have they woven it into their story? Would it cause a split between them in their evidence if not all charged were aware of the contents.
I also wondered whether there was something more complex about the investigation when forensics have spent so long in their former property in Byfleet.They have had a month in hiding to corroborate their stories with each other. They have had time to coach the kids on what to say and not say (IMOO).
Considering the 3 of them think of Sara's death as a mere "incident", I dont believe they will plead guilty! (again, MOO)
I think that the children (who are old enough) may well be the source of truth, sadly.
What worries me is that the police referred to the enquiry as "complex". I would have thought it was straightforward... where is the complexity coming from? Is there something more that we , as public, are not aware of?
JMOO
I wonder if the children will be returned to England without it being reported by the media.I am glad that they have brought charges without needing to interview the children. Although I suppose there is the possibility the oldest son may have been assisting UK police via video calls since he was placed into care.
She was seen by the next door neighbour in Horsell carrying the youngest child,though no date was given for when she was last seen .Were there steps in their current house? Maybe the poor child was injured catastrophically as far back as March/April, in the previous house. Spinal cord injury and they didn't get her medical help. Injuries, pressure sores, starvation, wasting away, no one single cause of death...
And that's why all three adults are complicit.
Brace yourselves.
JMO