Call_me_web_sloth
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2021
- Messages
- 47
- Reaction score
- 422
I can't help but snicker at the photo with the journalists' cameras up against the windows of the security van.
Bet he feels real uncomfortable.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I can't help but snicker at the photo with the journalists' cameras up against the windows of the security van.
Bet he feels real uncomfortable.
She was reported missing at around 8pm in the 4th of March. I don’t think it was 36 hours. I could of course be wrong.
I’ve always wondered with these shots (image attached courtesy of Daily Mail) Do they ever actually manage to get and publish a picture of the person in the van?! I don’t ever recall seeing a picture printed in MSM of the alleged offender sitting in the back of a holding van. Yet the press always do this in high profile cases!
I was going by what was reported in the article by the BBC. I think it said "roughly 36 hours" before a public appeal for information about her whereabouts was made.She was reported missing at around 8pm in the 4th of March. I don’t think it was 36 hours. I could of course be wrong.
I can't help but snicker at the photo with the journalists' cameras up against the windows of the security van.
Bet he feels real uncomfortable.
I have seen one or two printed over the years, but they are often quite indistinct
I vividly remember seeing one of Tania Clarence, but it was literally the back of her head - all you could see was her hair. I wonder if they’d even be allowed to publish if they got a facial picture - which begs the question why bother anyway!I’ve always wondered with these shots (image attached courtesy of Daily Mail) Do they ever actually manage to get and publish a picture of the person in the van?! I don’t ever recall seeing a picture printed in MSM of the alleged offender sitting in the back of a holding van. Yet the press always do this in high profile cases!
Am I being too kind to the police wondering if part of the reason the police don't want the vigils is because having charged WC they don't want anything happening at these events that might undermine a fair trial. Is covid-19 legislation a useful tool to stop them? They just seem very determined not to allow them. Just my opinion here obviously, just speculating.
They might be being overly cautious, but with the accused having the job he does it's not inconceivable that a few people with an anti-police agenda might turn up, and things get out of control. They just seem very determined to stop the vigil, and I'm wondering why.JMO but I don't see what could happen at a vigil that would undermine a trial
Also, the covid aspect has been tested in court.
I'm really local, and walk my dog daily on the Common in the early evening. The Common is busy with locals at that time at the weekends, indeed if it's a nice day it's very busy
MOO: they don't want huge crowds travelling to the Common from across London (maybe even beyond) and the congestion that would cause on public transport. That is a covid risk
If numbers in the Common are typical of a Saturday, and people pause near the bandstand, then I hope police will exercise tact and discretion
Former police officer Wayne was identified by street level doorbell cameras at the time that Sarah was abducted. He was the last person to see Sarah alive.
How long was it before Sarah's disappearance was understood as an abduction? The reason that this is an international story is because a police officer is the culprit.
I'm curious how long she was alive after abduction, how many hours between police recognizing this as a serious situation, and how many hours before police started looking - and no, this is not a racist issue.
I can recall a picture of the horrid Roy Whiting in the holding van. Most of the time they’re unable to get a decent shot but they do always try.I’ve always wondered with these shots (image attached courtesy of Daily Mail) Do they ever actually manage to get and publish a picture of the person in the van?! I don’t ever recall seeing a picture printed in MSM of the alleged offender sitting in the back of a holding van. Yet the press always do this in high profile cases!
So WC was seen on doorbell cams abducting Sarah?
So today the magistrate will refer to the Crown Court?
I wonder what the time scale will be? If he doesn’t plead guilty. 6 months to trial, or longer?
I did indeed, got a lot of work to catch up with today, but will update periodically if anything occurs xxThank you LL.
Hope you managed to get a well deserved break from the thread. This can’t be an easy case to follow for you being so close to home.x
Because there is a deadly pandemic at the moment. That’s why.They might be being overly cautious, but with the accused having the job he does it's not inconceivable that a few people with an anti-police agenda might turn up, and things get out of control. They just seem very determined to stop the vigil, and I'm wondering why.
This footage has never been released.
Yes I know but it was never officially said that WC was caught on the doorbell cam, only SE was? I can see why they would keep that information private though.