Does anyone have more information about this?
http://www.thecourier.co.uk/news/lo...ist-susan-mclean-proves-inconclusive-1.896872
Were the pills and vodka found by the searchers or the police? What kind of pills were they?
I'm just a bit confused, seeing as Susan would have had to tote these both out of her room, and she didn't have anything else on her person (phone, passport, etc.). I mean, if she was planning on doing this before she left, I can understand that, but she must have been very discreet about it then. I'm also wondering if this was a prescription with Susan's name on it or not? I guess I'm looking for answers as to how preemptive this was. The one searcher found a piece of paper - was there any sign of a note that may have been swept away or muddled in the rain?
I still find it so incredibly strange that no one, not even the dogs smelled her when she was only 25' from the trail for 3 months. Perhaps I am just emotional and having difficulty accepting the truth, but things still don't completely make sense to me here. Could she not have been found earlier because her body wasn't there earlier? Could she have and the bottles been planted at that location? I suppose if there was a major accident or struggle, it would have most likely been relieved in the postmortem. Am I turning into a lunatic over this?
I felt the sense of closure slip away a bit after reading the cause of death was inconclusive, but knowing Susan took her own life feels worse than not knowing at all.