Updates ~ Court clerk information

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves

New Posts

Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal Docket

Case Docket
Case Number: 5D10-3516
Final Criminal Judgment and Sentence Notice from Putnam County


HANK T. CROSLIN, JR. vs. STATE OF FLORIDA


Lower Tribunal Case(s): 10-147-CF



Date Docketed Description Date Due Filed By Notes
10/18/2010 Case Filing Fee
10/18/2010 Notice of Appeal Filed Appellant

11/22/2010 Order to Show Cause 12/07/2010 W/I 15DAYS AA SHOW CAUSE WHY UNTIMELY APPEAL SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURIS. SEE, E.G., WINSLOW V. STATE, 37 SO.3D 974(FLA. 1ST DCA 2010)("A MOTION TO REDUCE A SENTENCE IS NOT A POST-JUDGMENT MOTION WHICH TOLLS THE TIME FOR FILNG AN APPEAL"). UPON CONSIDERTION THAT THE JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE WAS RENDERED (FILED) 8/6/10, BUT THE NOA WAS NOT FILED UNTIL 10/4/10, MORE THAN 30DAYS LATER, AND AS A MOT FOR MODIFICATION OF SENTENCE PURSUANT TO FRCP 3.800(c) DOES NOT TOLL THE TIME TO APPEAL, IT IS ORDERED.....

12/07/2010 Miscellaneous Motion Appellant ALLOW BELATED APPEAL & MOT REL JURIS

04/06/2011 Grant Miscellaneous Motion AA'S 12/7MOT IS GRANTED AND APPEAL PROCEED AS TIMELY FILED AND MOT REL JURIS IS MOOT

04/06/2011 Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief 06/06/2011 NO FURTHER EOT

=========
Tommy's appeal moves forward. Court is accepting his late appeal as timely. He has until June to file initial brief.
 
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal Docket

Case Docket
Case Number: 5D10-3883
Final Criminal Judgment and Sentence Notice from St. Johns County


MISTY JANETTE CROSLIN CUMMINGS vs. STATE OF FLORIDA


Lower Tribunal Case(s): 10-141-CFMA



Date Docketed Description Date Due Filed By Notes
11/10/2010 Notice of Appeal Filed Withdrawn Appellant
11/10/2010 LT CRT ORD O/INDG & APP O/CNSL
11/17/2010 Court Reporter Ack. Letter AMENDED
12/07/2010 Received Records 1VOL
12/29/2010 Motion To File Supplemental Record Appellant
01/03/2011 Order Granting Motion to Supplement the Record 02/02/2011
01/13/2011 Court Reporter Ack. Letter
01/28/2011 Supplemental Records 1VOL
02/07/2011 Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief Appellant
02/09/2011 Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief 04/08/2011 ATTYS EMAIL BRFS IN COMPLIANCE WITH AOA5D08-01;NO FURTHER EOT
04/07/2011 Initial Brief on Merits Public Defender ANDERS BRF
04/07/2011 Motion To Withdraw as Counsel Appellant RE: ANDERS APPEAL


======================


Anders brief Law Definition n

A request filed by a court-appointed attorney to withdraw from the appeal of a criminal case because of his belief that the grounds for the appeal are frivolous. Named after Anders v. California (1967).
 
krkrjx said:
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal Docket

Case Docket
Case Number: 5D10-3883
Final Criminal Judgment and Sentence Notice from St. Johns County


MISTY JANETTE CROSLIN CUMMINGS vs. STATE OF FLORIDA


Lower Tribunal Case(s): 10-141-CFMA



Date Docketed Description Date Due Filed By Notes
11/10/2010 Notice of Appeal Filed Withdrawn Appellant
11/10/2010 LT CRT ORD O/INDG & APP O/CNSL
11/17/2010 Court Reporter Ack. Letter AMENDED
12/07/2010 Received Records 1VOL
12/29/2010 Motion To File Supplemental Record Appellant
01/03/2011 Order Granting Motion to Supplement the Record 02/02/2011
01/13/2011 Court Reporter Ack. Letter
01/28/2011 Supplemental Records 1VOL
02/07/2011 Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief Appellant
02/09/2011 Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief 04/08/2011 ATTYS EMAIL BRFS IN COMPLIANCE WITH AOA5D08-01;NO FURTHER EOT
04/07/2011 Initial Brief on Merits Public Defender ANDERS BRF
04/07/2011 Motion To Withdraw as Counsel Appellant RE: ANDERS APPEAL


======================


Anders brief Law Definition n

A request filed by a court-appointed attorney to withdraw from the appeal of a criminal case because of his belief that the grounds for the appeal are frivolous. Named after Anders v. California (1967).
Click to expand...

If Misty's appeal is considered frivolous, what is Ron's after he got a deal and reduced sentence?
 
titanfan62702 said:
If Misty's appeal is considered frivolous, what is Ron's after he got a deal and reduced sentence?
Click to expand...

I think the reason they consider it frivolous is because here in Florida there are soooooo many drug dealers and doctor shoppers and none of them are doing the time these peeps are and most of them have sold more dope.



What i cant seem to understand is why do they have to do so much time and others dont? I really think if they get the right lawyer they will get out.
I dont want these ppl out on the street but

Whats the law here?
 
Eileen:

It would be interesting if you show us where others don't get the same. Every case I've seen they are charged alike. The judges hands are tied..they must serve the minimum.

It is the judges discretion to sentence...however; the drug trafficking laws are set in stone. There is a minimum....four of the five got the lowest allowed. tommy is the only one who could possibly win an appeal.

Trafficking laws and penalties are all the same in Florida. No one is getting less than the minimum allowed. I think people get trafficking and possession confused. Traffickers will not get any better than the minimum. There are mandatory minimums for trafficking. It ranges from three to life...all dependent on the amount/weight of the drugs.
 
Kristina Prevatt aka Naynay docket update. Drug court rejected...bet she will do some jail time.

07/08/2009 1 ARREST REPORT - PCSO D/S DORTON (ARREST 7/4/09)

07/08/2009 1 BOOKING NUMBER: 09-2753

07/08/2009 1 POSSESSION OF COCAINE

07/08/2009 1 POSSESSION OF DRUG PARAPHERNALIA

Snip

04/06/2011 50 DRUG COURT HEARING MINUTES: DEFT PRESENT, REJECTED

04/06/2011 50 BY THE STATE FOR DRUG COURT DEFT TO FOLLOW TRADITIONAL

04/06/2011 50 COURT DOCKET
 
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal Docket

Case Docket
Case Number: 5D11-813
Final Criminal 3.800 Notice from Putnam County


RONALD CUMMINGS vs. STATE OF FLORIDA


Lower Tribunal Case(s): 10-145-CF-52, 10-146-CF-52, 10-253-CF-52



Date Docketed Description Date Due Filed By Notes
03/11/2011 Notice of Appeal Filed Pro Se - Appellant
03/11/2011 REC-3.800 SUMM DENIAL
03/23/2011 Initial Brief on Merits Pro Se - Appellant
03/25/2011 ORD-Appellee to file Response-3.800 04/14/2011 W/I 20DAYS;ATTYS EMAIL RESPONSE IN COMPLIANCE WITH AO5D08-01
04/14/2011 Motion To Compel Appellee "MOT EOT FILE RESPONSE PER 3/21ORDER"

=========
Do not know what this Motion to Compel could be about, but it is not Ron's motion, it's the SA's motion.

It looks weird the way it copied. It is not a motion to compel the apellee to do anything...it is a motion to compel filed by the apellee (the SA).
 
nomoresorrow said:
So essentially, if I'm reading this correctly, the state is compeling RC to provide sufficient discovery evidence in order to back up his claim? Any thoughts? (or help here...TIA)
Click to expand...

I think it means the next thing we probably see is Ron withdrawing his appeal, lol.
 
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal Docket
Case Docket
Case Number: 5D11-242
Final Criminal Judgment and Sentence Notice from Putnam County

MISTY JANETTE CUMMINGS A/K/A MISTY CROSLIN vs. STATE OF FLORIDA

Lower Tribunal Case(s): 10-138-CF, 10-139-CF, 10-140-CF, 10-141-CF, 10-142-CF, 10-251-CF, 10-252-CF

Date Docketed***Description*********Date Due****Filed By*****Notes

01/24/2011 Court Reporter Ack. Letter
01/24/2011 Notice of Appeal Filed************Withdrawn Appellant
01/24/2011 LT CRT ORD O/INDG & APP O/CNSL
03/09/2011 Received Records******************************2VOL
03/17/2011 Motion To File Supplemental Record*****Appellant
03/18/2011 Order Granting Motion to Supplement
the Record***********************04/18/2011
03/29/2011 Court Reporter Ack. Letter
04/13/2011 Supplemental Records***************************1VOL
http://199.242.69.70/pls/ds/ds_docket?p_caseyear=2011&p_casenumber=242&psCourt=5&psSearchType=
 
nomoresorrow said:
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal Docket
Case Docket
Case Number: 5D11-242
Final Criminal Judgment and Sentence Notice from Putnam County

MISTY JANETTE CUMMINGS A/K/A MISTY CROSLIN vs. STATE OF FLORIDA

Lower Tribunal Case(s): 10-138-CF, 10-139-CF, 10-140-CF, 10-141-CF, 10-142-CF, 10-251-CF, 10-252-CF

Date Docketed***Description*********Date Due****Filed By*****Notes

01/24/2011 Court Reporter Ack. Letter
01/24/2011 Notice of Appeal Filed************Withdrawn Appellant
01/24/2011 LT CRT ORD O/INDG & APP O/CNSL
03/09/2011 Received Records******************************2VOL
03/17/2011 Motion To File Supplemental Record*****Appellant
03/18/2011 Order Granting Motion to Supplement
the Record***********************04/18/2011
03/29/2011 Court Reporter Ack. Letter
04/13/2011 Supplemental Records***************************1VOL
http://199.242.69.70/pls/ds/ds_docket?p_caseyear=2011&p_casenumber=242&psCourt=5&psSearchType=
Click to expand...

Thanks NMS!!!!

With no law backgroud, i have no clue what this means. Can you or someone else please explain?

TIA :)
 
lil momma said:
Thanks NMS!!!!

With no law backgroud, i have no clue what this means. Can you or someone else please explain?

TIA :)
Click to expand...

I'm sorry lil'momma but I'm not much help here either. I just wanted to help keep Misty's court docs up-to-date. When I noticed the recent action, I posted it.... I'm sure one of our other gifted & talented WS members will come to the rescue!
 
lil momma said:
Thanks NMS!!!!

With no law backgroud, i have no clue what this means. Can you or someone else please explain?

TIA :)
Click to expand...

Misty's atty had filed a motion to supplement the record and that motion was granted by the court. An order was issued to the lower court to send those records. They have complied and now the appellate court has received the supplemental records. This would include documents pertinent to Misty case, her plea, conviction and anything that had been considered in imposing sentence.

At least I think that's what it is. I have some legal background but my experience is limited to procedures in my state, which is not Florida.
 
krkrjx said:
Misty's atty had filed a motion to supplement the record and that motion was granted by the court. An order was issued to the lower court to send those records. They have complied and now the appellate court has received the supplemental records. This would include documents pertinent to Misty case, her plea, conviction and anything that had been considered in imposing sentence.

At least I think that's what it is. I have some legal background but my experience is limited to procedures in my state, which is not Florida.
Click to expand...

Thank you for explaining that so well krkrjx!
 
krkrjx said:
Misty's atty had filed a motion to supplement the record and that motion was granted by the court. An order was issued to the lower court to send those records. They have complied and now the appellate court has received the supplemental records. This would include documents pertinent to Misty case, her plea, conviction and anything that had been considered in imposing sentence.

At least I think that's what it is. I have some legal background but my experience is limited to procedures in my state, which is not Florida.
Click to expand...

Thanks SO much, again :)
 
Nay Nay and Pytko udates. They had court today. NN is still showing in PCSO custody but released per her booking. She's probably going somewhere.

http://public.pcso.us/jail/bookingDetails.aspx?SYSID=765572&IMG=37631

Pytko was released. The dockets aren't updated yet.

http://public.pcso.us/jail/bookingDetails.aspx?SYSID=765864&IMG=44656

PYTKO
Offender ID: 20226 Date of Birth: 02/14/1976 Age: 35 Race: White Gender: Male
Custody Status: Out of Custody Date: 04/27/2011 Reason: General release

https://www.vinelink.com/vinelink/d...=10000&agency=54&id=20226&searchType=offender
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

DNASolves

Who is DeKalb County John Doe (2022)?

Members online

... and 150 more.
Total: 2,145 (members: 151, guests: 1,994)

Online statistics

Members online
151
Guests online
1,994
Total visitors
2,145
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
601,943
Messages
18,132,312
Members
231,190
Latest member
JMpavashootski
Back
Top