fred&edna
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2012
- Messages
- 11,137
- Reaction score
- 63,748
Just because a student may not be ' white, straight, neurotypical, etc' it does not mean that they shouldn't have to follow basic classroom rules, which are designed to make it possible for everyone to learn together in class.
I have seen many times, students and parents who think that their special attributes or circumstances should mean thAt they don't need to sit down, be quiet, listen to the teacher and follow instructions. Sometimes they say 'we can't focus or concentrate so we want to be allowed to do our own thing while the rest of the class is reading or studying or listening to the lecture. Parents will say 'let my child listen to headphones or work on their tablet' or draw while the class does something else. But then the students may begin being disruptive by standing or walking around, talking while others are studying, etc. How is that fair or beneficial to the rest of the class? Or even beneficial to the student in the long run?
It has nothing to do with race or gender etc, it has to do with learning to follow basic instructions and cooperate with others. It is not being 'used against others' if those others are acting disruptive and volatile. It is being done to protect the remaining students who are there to learn how to be successful students and future citizens.
Bottom line, If a child picks up a chair and throws it at a teacher, sorry, but they need to receive some serious help, which is more than a regular mainstream classroom can offer, IMO.
Best post I've read in a long, long time !
In my opinion, it seems many adults (teens and children) in our society seem unwilling, resentful and actively resistant to "following basic instructions and cooperating with others". This "anti" behavior is wrong and it's killing us all!
Mollycoddling needs to stop.