VA - Amy Bradley, 23, Petersburg, 24 March 1998 - #1

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
I wonder if furniture stores in Curacau have websites.

Some of them do I'm sure. I've been working through this list of stores, but I started with Barbados for some reason. Here's the website I started with (and they have all kinds of other links for other places) http://www.ostamyy.com/furnitures/Barbados.htm A lot of the links are dead, but it is a starting place with names.

I've taken all kinds of rabbit trails visiting auction houses, apartments for rent...anything that has pictures of bedroom furniture.
 
Some of them do I'm sure. I've been working through this list of stores, but I started with Barbados for some reason. Here's the website I started with (and they have all kinds of other links for other places) http://www.ostamyy.com/furnitures/Barbados.htm A lot of the links are dead, but it is a starting place with names.

I've taken all kinds of rabbit trails visiting auction houses, apartments for rent...anything that has pictures of bedroom furniture.

I've been in so many rabbit holes looking for things to do with Amy and know what you are going through. If I don't bookmark things though I forget where I have seen things. There just has to be a break in this case somehow.
 
FindAmy - if you still have the original photos that you downloaded from the escort site, there is a chance you can pick up the meta data encoded in the picture. I ran the pictures that are posted on hyscience, but since they were compiled in Photoshop, I am only getting a Nov. 2005 date and what version of Photoshop he used to put together the 2 images.

If you have images that are straight from the web and haven't been altered with any graphics program like Photoshop, there is a chance to get the original data.

Here is a site that you can use: http://imgops.com/. After you upload the photo(s) you'll need to click the link that says "Hidden data: exif/xmp/gps"

I am able to get at what is the original photo that was on that site by using the Wayback Machine which captures sites at point in time. Here is the link:

http://wayback.archive.org/web/2004...vacations.com/guest_escorts_entertainers.htm\

I ran one of the photos through the imgops and got this information:

ETA: that link is not working so I will do it this way:

http://www.affordable-adult-vacations.com/guest_escorts_entertainers.htm
http://wayback.archive.org

Just put the first link into the search bar for the wayback machine.
 

Attachments

  • Pix information.png
    Pix information.png
    9.8 KB · Views: 498
I am able to get at what is the original photo that was on that site by using the Wayback Machine which captures sites at point in time. Here is the link:

http://wayback.archive.org/web/2004...vacations.com/guest_escorts_entertainers.htm\

I ran one of the photos through the imgops and got this information:

ETA: that link is not working so I will do it this way:

http://www.affordable-adult-vacations.com/guest_escorts_entertainers.htm
http://wayback.archive.org

Just put the first link into the search bar for the wayback machine.

That is so awesome! I tried to follow your link but we have adult sites blocked at the DNS level because we have teenage boys. It is a good thing for protecting them from *advertiser censored*, but a bad thing when it comes to my sleuthing!

Did you run the photo through imgops.com? ETA - Oops sorry - just saw that you did run it through that. :)
 
That is so awesome! I tried to follow your link but we have adult sites blocked at the DNS level because we have teenage boys. It is a good thing for protecting them from *advertiser censored*, but a bad thing when it comes to my sleuthing!

Did you run the photo through imgops.com? ETA - Oops sorry - just saw that you did run it through that. :)

Lol...I have stuff on this computer that nobody should have - kids get to use the laptop while I use the honking desktop computer.

I am seeing LEAD Technologies v1.01 as being associated with Olympus digital camera and the pixels at 350 x 346 is a really low resolution. This is only initial research only and I am no expert at cameras so will leave the sleuthing to those who know more about this subject.

350 × 346 JPEG
13,828 bytes (0.013 megabytes) Image compression: 96%
 
I am able to get at what is the original photo that was on that site by using the Wayback Machine which captures sites at point in time. Here is the link:

http://wayback.archive.org/web/2004...vacations.com/guest_escorts_entertainers.htm\

I ran one of the photos through the imgops and got this information:

ETA: that link is not working so I will do it this way:

http://www.affordable-adult-vacations.com/guest_escorts_entertainers.htm
http://wayback.archive.org

Just put the first link into the search bar for the wayback machine.




elepher50 - thank you so much.
 
I know that in other cases we have been able to isolate the gps coordinates from pictures to pinpoint where pictures have been taken. Unfortunately, this picture looks like it is too early for any gps information. I did run it through and this is what came out:
 

Attachments

  • No gps information.jpg
    No gps information.jpg
    34.6 KB · Views: 85
I am so impressed by all of you. I hope you all realize how important this could be and that this could lead to other things discovered. Thank you so much for all that you are doing.
 
I know that in other cases we have been able to isolate the gps coordinates from pictures to pinpoint where pictures have been taken. Unfortunately, this picture looks like it is too early for any gps information. I did run it through and this is what came out:



Thank you so much.
 
If anybody can do anything more with the original picture on the site, here is the url and I will put it in quotes so you can copy and paste it:

"http://wayback.archive.org/web/20041001000000*/http://www.affordable-adult-vacations.com/guest_escorts_entertainers.htm"

Hopefully this link will work.

ETA: Yes, just tested it and it is a go if you copy the url and put it in your browser ....yay now you all can run that picture through more software.
 
This will absolutely reinforce my lack of knowledge in this area. This afternoon we were all talking about the idea that the pictures could have been still captures from a video. If those pictures were originally from a video, would that explain why everything came up with no information?
 
I think it was through the Wayback Machine that we were able to determine the original dates for posting those pictures of Amy.
 
I think it was through the Watback Machine that we were able to determine the original dates for posting those pictures of Amy.

Yes, absolutely - I can see that the pictures started in 2004 on that site.
 
I've been in so many rabbit holes looking for things to do with Amy and know what you are going through. If I don't bookmark things though I forget where I have seen things. There just has to be a break in this case somehow.





I can't tell you how many things I've lost because I didn't mark them right away.
 
This will absolutely reinforce my lack of knowledge in this area. This afternoon we were all talking about the idea that the pictures could have been still captures from a video. If those pictures were originally from a video, would that explain why everything came up with no information?

I think JustBeachy is probably our resident expert on cameras/pictures. I have just asked JustBeachy to pop over to Amy's thread when there is a spare moment - not sure what cases JB is following right now. She will probably pop over once she gets my message if she is still on the site right now.

eleph
 
I think JustBeachy is probably our resident expert on cameras/pictures. I have just asked JustBeachy to pop over to Amy's thread when there is a spare moment - not sure what cases JB is following right now. She will probably pop over once she gets my message if she is still on the site right now.

eleph





Thanks eleph, for calling in the troops. If those three photographs are actually video captures, I wonder if that would explain what was bothering Peggy Ann about pixel alignments on the right side of the first photograph.
 
I've changed my IP address so I can now go around the DNS blocks we have in place for my kids. yay! :) Anyway...does anyone have the url to the 1st image (the one where she is up on her knees)? I can find jas1.jpg and jas2.jpg but where is the 3rd one located on the site?
 
so glad the conversation has gotten past the point of is this her or isnt it i truly believe it is here even looking at the way the eye brows look its the same!! so hoping that something comes through every little bit of info helps!! i too have had many late nights thinking about things from this thread... someone has seen her someone knows where she is i just wish they would do the right thing
 
so glad the conversation has gotten past the point of is this her or isnt it i truly believe it is here even looking at the way the eye brows look its the same!! so hoping that something comes through every little bit of info helps!! i too have had many late nights thinking about things from this thread... someone has seen her someone knows where she is i just wish they would do the right thing

I know what you mean. The number of people that must have been involved in her disappearance, and her ongoing disappearance must be huge. Surely one of them could have some kind of an attack of conscious and want to give Amy's family answers. I have a hard time wrapping my brain around it sometimes. How could someone not do the right thing.
 
I know what you mean. The number of people that must have been involved in her disappearance, and her ongoing disappearance must be huge. Surely one of them could have some kind of an attack of conscious and want to give Amy's family answers. I have a hard time wrapping my brain around it sometimes. How could someone not do the right thing.

Some people are just plain evil and doing the right thing would never even occur to them. They do not know what is right as it is all about them and their needs/wants. Cases on WS that have struck me as really evil are: Zahra Baker, Sandra Cantu, Jonathon Foster, Shaniya Davis .... and the list goes on.

I just sat and reread what I wrote and something just struck me - all of the WS cases that I listed here had a female perp who murdered these kids with the exception of Shaniya Davis and she was sold by her mother to a man to pay a drug debt so I guess the initial perp would still be a female (her mother). Evil - evil - evil and Evil.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
160
Guests online
2,722
Total visitors
2,882

Forum statistics

Threads
602,631
Messages
18,144,166
Members
231,468
Latest member
CapeCodTodd
Back
Top