Jersey*Girl
Active Member
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2008
- Messages
- 10,266
- Reaction score
- 152
Looking at the video a little closer, I do see some inconsistencies. Amy's eyes appear to be a little more widely-set. With the right-eyes, nose, and mouth aligned, the left eye appears to drift outward when the overlay switches to Amy. There is a very slight difference in camera angles that may account in-part for that difference, but I don't think the difference in camera angles is substantial enough to explain the apparent difference in pupillary distance.
Also, the ears appear to be quite different.
Here's the link again:
http://youtu.be/Q-GaKZsHN3Q
Carl, thank you again. I keep going back & forth whether I believe it's her or not. However here's something to think about: If that picture wasn't proven to be Amy, then that would explain why the FBI & Interpol haven't shared the data of where that picture originated. Then again, if these authorities knew it wasn't Amy & held that bit of info from the Bradleys, well that'd be kinda odd to say the least... I'm up in the air. We did this in that CMA pic & I was absolutely positive it was her & as it turned out I was 100% wrong - it wasn't her, it was a chick that loves *advertiser censored*. So, is this Amy or not? From my understanding nobody has verified they're absolutely certain it's her. The closest I've seen anyone saying they're certain is on the Dr Phil show where it was said it very well could be and that several FBI / professional people looked at the comparisons...
Ok, back to my date night with 2 of my rotten sons...