VA - Anjelica "AJ" Hadsell, 18, Norfolk, 3 March 2015 #10

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves

New Posts

Status
Not open for further replies.
CookieM said:
Okay, so don't accuse me of being a "Font Freak" but I think the first letter is a capital G because you can see it doesn't end in an open curl like the C does and you can see where it has the straight stroke up on the right. Compare it to that real clear C in Card. The last letter I think is a y because it has the extra stress on the left side like an italicized y does in Times.
Click to expand...

Ummm... it looks like a person's name begins with C ends with y. And that's all I can say.
 
Mountain_Kat said:
I don't know the answer to that. But my question is this: when you file a missing persons report, and then ask if anything is missing, you don't do a total inventory of your house, do you? I mean, what the heck made JH jump to looking for ammo? Was it visuallu obvious that it was missing? Do they keep it on the kitchen counter or something?
Click to expand...

No. This is not normal. Especially for an 18 year old's MPR.
This is more like a list for b&e. IMO
 
mom2six said:
Ummm... it looks like a person's name begins with C ends with y. And that's all I can say.
Click to expand...

How in the heck would that be listed under missing property? This is ALL missing property. Yes?
 
Mountain_Kat said:
013 Gerev ?
013 Gorep ?
Click to expand...

No tail on that last letter so that's def a v. It's hard to tell in some places were type begins and where redaction ends, and vice versa but in other places it's very clear.
 
Mountain_Kat said:
I don't know the answer to that. But my question is this: when you file a missing persons report, and then ask if anything is missing, you don't do a total inventory of your house, do you? I mean, what the heck made JH jump to looking for ammo? Was it visuallu obvious that it was missing? Do they keep it on the kitchen counter or something?
Click to expand...
Exactly. "Yes, officer, her laundry is missing, so is her cell phone, her credit cards. Oh, and some ammo." That's why it makes a big difference in my mind as to whether WH was a part of this report. I'm thinking he wasn't (for now, anyway). But if he wasn't contributing to the report, what made her think to report these missing items? Did anyone else help her with the "inventory" for this report?

I'm concerned with how many people might have been hanging out at that house during the immediate time period both before and after her disappearance. If there was an argument between AJ and JH, it is possible AJ was upset about other people who were at the house all the time.
 
Ontario Mom said:
No tail on that last letter so that's def a v. It's hard to tell in some places were type begins and where redaction ends, and vice versa but in other places it's very clear.
Click to expand...

Then it isn't a "y" either. :mad:
 
Ontario Mom said:
No tail on that last letter so that's def a v. It's hard to tell in some places were type begins and where redaction ends, and vice versa but in other places it's very clear.
Click to expand...

Is there a medication that may be Cerev or Gerev??
 
Mountain_Kat said:
I don't know the answer to that. But my question is this: when you file a missing persons report, and then ask if anything is missing, you don't do a total inventory of your house, do you? I mean, what the heck made JH jump to looking for ammo? Was it visuallu obvious that it was missing? Do they keep it on the kitchen counter or something?
Click to expand...

I suspect JH was asked if AJ could have a weapon with her, JH checked and realized the gun and ammo was missing, and it got listed. More likely WH took it when he left a few weeks before, and JH didn't know.

Sent from my KFJWA using Tapatalk
 
Hypothetical situation...IF two adults are involved in a missing persons case of someone close to them, and even though these two adults aren't supposedly living together, BUT both are involved, why not make it appear as someone broke in your residence and abducted a person from your household AND if there's a possibility that items may be found/recovered during the search for that missing person, well then why not to cover your *advertiser censored**, just go ahead and include those items in the missing person report. Hence, it THEN makes it appear a POSSIBILITY that WHO-ever is responsible for abducting the missing person, also TOOK the other items listed as well. Sounds like IMO this took lots of pre-planning/premeditation and the mind(S) of more than one responsible person to get it planned out, oh just so well, to cover all bases.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

DNASolves

Who is Fairfield County Jane Doe (1993)?

Members online

... and 181 more.
Total: 437 (members: 182, guests: 255)

Online statistics

Members online
182
Guests online
255
Total visitors
437
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
609,344
Messages
18,253,002
Members
234,638
Latest member
Josefa
Back
Top