Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Here's my question - I understand completely why we can't discuss elephants on WS. However, why isn't MSM all over this? What's their reasoning for not sharing elephant behavior?
First, welcome Second, there are certain things we really can't talk about here due to TOS so I'll be as informative as possible without getting grounded
I can honestly tell you, if I were not a member of WS and following this case, and did my own research on the names associated with the case, every red flag on the planet would be firmly planted in one place. Would I go all over social media posting that info? Probably not, or at least not to the degree some might. However, that being said, I believe LE is well aware of all the same things we are, and probably knows a LOT more than we do (at least I would hope so). As for how long certain folks have had accounts on SM, all it takes is a quick look at their number of posts or tweets & scrolling down to see the kinds of topics they're interested in (some accounts state "member since 20xx" but others do not). You can usually tell when the account is a recent SM Troll just activated for that purpose.
Cautioning against tunnel vision is wise, because there have been cases we've all followed and then went WHOA!! when the case is brought to a conclusion. Sometimes it's someone no one ever suspected, mentioned or even heard of. Sometimes all the signals point the wrong way. It's just the way it works sometimes.
MOO.
What if...
local LE on this case have SO much circumstantial evidence it would choke a rhino, but they need just 1 more thing to bust the case wide open. Knowing full well if the local media got wind of what they know (or published it or broadcasted it if they do already know), it would give the suspect (who has not been publicly named for the same reason) ample opportunity to destroy any evidence and the case falls apart. So, they request a media blackout for that very reason and the local media comply.
Too far of a reach? Does that even happen? I know back in the day (and I mean back in the day before internet/social media wildfire) it was a lot easier for LE to keep the media at bay but now? I don't know...
What if...
local LE on this case have SO much circumstantial evidence it would choke a rhino, but they need just 1 more thing to bust the case wide open. Knowing full well if the local media got wind of what they know (or published it or broadcasted it if they do already know), it would give the suspect (who has not been publicly named for the same reason) ample opportunity to destroy any evidence and the case falls apart. So, they request a media blackout for that very reason and the local media comply.
Too far of a reach? Does that even happen? I know back in the day (and I mean back in the day before internet/social media wildfire) it was a lot easier for LE to keep the media at bay but now? I don't know...
Does a judge have to order a subpoena to a cell phone company to get that phone's records in order to get ping info and other cell phone information?
Here's my question - I understand completely why we can't discuss elephants on WS. However, why isn't MSM all over this? What's their reasoning for not sharing elephant behavior?
Maybe LE has requested them Not to!
What if...
local LE on this case have SO much circumstantial evidence it would choke a rhino, but they need just 1 more thing to bust the case wide open. Knowing full well if the local media got wind of what they know (or published it or broadcasted it if they do already know), it would give the suspect (who has not been publicly named for the same reason) ample opportunity to destroy any evidence and the case falls apart. So, they request a media blackout for that very reason and the local media comply.
Too far of a reach? Does that even happen? I know back in the day (and I mean back in the day before internet/social media wildfire) it was a lot easier for LE to keep the media at bay but now? I don't know...
LE does sometimes request the media to hold back. Also, MSM, reputable ones, adhere to similar "rules" as we do here: until a person is named as a POI, they won't publish.
This is the last missing case I remember in the area. Maybe you could look at this and see if LE is doing any more or less.
http://wtkr.com/2012/11/29/family-f...norfolk-woman-found-dead-in-neighbors-closet/
Rather late last night there was a call for NPD to come to that twitter link to see the bad mouthing that was being made to the elephant- that may be why it is down. Just guessing.
AJ's SM is pretty tightly locked, good for her.
Twitter: anjelicamariee
Facebook: anjelica.hadsell
Pinterest: anjelicaamarie
Youtube: Anjelicaahadsell
Google+
Instagram: @anjelicaamarie
Two thoughts:
1. Seeing her boards on Pinterest about her ideas for a future wedding really rips my heart out. Makes me really want to believe she is still out there and doing okay.
2. I am in total agreement w. something having happened to her earlier than the third. That would mean that the neighbor's story about seeing her truck wasn't true, but it has become clear lately that no one REALLY knows what time she was anywhere. Like, if she met up with her dad at a gas station around 1pm for cash, why would she drive to the house an hour later? Makes no sense.
Anyway she tweets roughly 15 times a day. In the days leading up to her disappearance she was tweeting even more frequently - I imagine since it was spring break she had more time on her hands. Then it completely stops on March 1st. That is ridiculously abnormal! If she is still in contact with her parents via cellphone by the 3rd, it makes no sense whatsoever that she would not be tweeting for a few days straight considering she literally tweets all the time. ESPECIALLY if something was going on in her life... you would think she would be tweeting more like "ugh so stressed" or something.