PAXIMUS
Registered user
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2009
- Messages
- 3,047
- Reaction score
- 38
SYNIISTER may well end up being the most interesting witness in this case. He is BOTH a witness for the prosecution AND the defense. For the prosecution he establishes that Sam actually admitted to "killing them all," in his phone call to Syniister, yet Syniister also tells us that "we dont know what Sam had been going through in his life leading up to the murders," a comment that seemingly fits in VERY NICELY with the defense attorneys comment that "You need to get to know my client before you judge him."
THIS MAKES ME WONDER if the defense may try and introduce ABUSE in to Sams narration, that he was an abused child or something and this led him down this path to murder and mayhem, this of course likely wouldnt end with an acquittal or hung jury but MIGHT be a successful defense to get CAPITAL PUNISHMENT off the table and get Sam LWOP.
THIS MAKES ME WONDER if the defense may try and introduce ABUSE in to Sams narration, that he was an abused child or something and this led him down this path to murder and mayhem, this of course likely wouldnt end with an acquittal or hung jury but MIGHT be a successful defense to get CAPITAL PUNISHMENT off the table and get Sam LWOP.