Samantharock
Just Smile
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2014
- Messages
- 46
- Reaction score
- 0
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The poster states the mugshot/photo was taken on Friday. Unless he just happened to update his photo ID for his employer/DMV, I doubt it would be from them?
He was the lady person seen with a missing girl. That's evidence. And he won't talk. That's suspicious.
Can we stop talking about the gloves? If they were evidence, they would have been taken out of the apartment in a paper bag/evidence bag. They are obviously the LE's gloves.
He is a wanted man
Parker Slaybaugh @Parker8News
BREAKING: WANTED Poster for Jesse Matthew has just been released. #HannahGraham
PLEASE RT THIS PHOTO http://t.co/Bdlo0816CY
4:16am - 23 Sep 14
Given that the person who made this poster originally included his social security number, I dont have much confidence in their abilities ATM.
The photo date could be nothing more than the date this poster was started on.
Jmo this was a one person crime, seemingly/possibly committed by JM. No ring, no gang, no posse, etc
It is textbook to me of a casual pick-up that probably ended up as a sexual assault and murder. Whether he has done it before, I am not so sure. He certainly isn't very good at keeping a low profile as far as the night of this crime, the stand-out car, being seen everywhere, etc.
And now he is on the run, apparently.
Just get him situated behind bars on whatever charges are possible at this point and concentrate on evidence and searching. Forget about him "chatting" with LE. That ship has sailed.
Jmo
Are there even enough possible topics to break into a forum? The case might be active, but I don't think it is that complex. I guess you could have threads about:
-Longo's way of handling the case
-People who knew JM
-Camera footage
-Should JM turn himself in/talk to LE/discussion
sitting on hands :gaah: waiting for new thread, and one which will be a forum with subjects being split out as we are NOW finally over 1,000 again.
I cannot follow everything and trying to catch up and find myself skipping 100's of posts. And I missed sooooooooooo much doing so.
Please please please please mods break this into a forum with sub-threads.raying:
It's been less than 11 hours and we are at 1,123 posts, and just too fast to follow and I've missed too much. Break out's please for topics mods! IMHO
I am having arguments with myself ... Anyone else doing the same?
Argument 1. They seem to be zeroing in on one person, seem to be vilifying one person without apparent evidence.
Argument 2. If this was my child and he was the last person known to be with her "before she disappeared off the face of the Earth" I damn sure would want the same aggressive investigation being done! Maybe if more investigations were so transparent about their opinions than more people would come forward and more perpetrators of crimes would be caught
I have been having the same internal argument. I think it's possible to feel both things -- that if you were a family member you would feel and think one thing and that if you're a person with no tie to the case, who's generally concerned with fairness, you might feel a different way.
ETA: I also sometimes look at it from the perspective of her family and then his. If I were her family, I'd want the biggest circus and the most possible pressure brought on him to bear; if I were his family, I'd want him to be treated fairly by the police, the media, and the public.
"The test of a first-rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposed ideas in mind at the same time and still retain the ability to function." - F. Scott Fitzgerald
This is what you said "Everyone is saying "what if he isn't guilty?" Hang on one second, what if he is the person who disappeared Hannah? Why are people so sure this man didn't hurt Hannah? I don't know one way or the other but there are so many people shouting about this guy not being involved. Well he is involved, inasmuch as he's the last person seen with Hannah and he won't co-operate.
My response was asking you to back up your specific comments - where you see people "so sure this man didn't hurt Hannah" and "so many people shouting about this guy not being involved". Just point me to some of these "so many people" who are shouting that JM isn't involved.
I never claimed anyone said that they were "sure" he wasn't guilty. I said people are saying "what if he isn't guilty?" I'm asking, and maybe I phrased it clumsily, what it is that makes them doubt his involvement? Because I don't know if he is guilty or innocent but I can see exactly why LE are after him. People have talked about him suing police if he's innocent. If he's guilty though they have played it right.