VA - Johnny Depp's defamation case against ex Amber Heard, who countersued #13

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
Just have a few quick minutes and no time to read back on the thread but do i understand correctly AH gave an interview this weekend,hence the flying to NYC, and basically claimed in it that the Jurors did not believe HER, only, mainly, because JD is such a good actor and therefor, beloved guy? In a nutshell? The externalizing of blame is strong in this BPD/HD! :D
 
Same old story, same old song, just like when she was on the stand. She lost doing this same thing…. lying and gaslighting. She has no self awareness, or insight, and has a completely warped sense of reality. She seriously needs to be tried for perjury. And after this I really hope JD makes her pay the money. All of it. I wish now the jury had awarded him the full 50 mill.

Id love to see someone like Ben and friends take her on for perjury. They would tear her to shreds but then it will be someone else’s fault for finding her guilty of perjury. As you said: ”Same old story, same old song….”
 
I really hope she caught some of the Jubilee celebrations from over here, I would love to have seen her face as she watched Kate Moss dancing atop the 90's national treasures bus.
I bet it would've put her dog stepped on a bee face to shame :p:D

She did celebrate the jubilee in person. She was photographed with a large celebratory group and she was wearing the British flag on her leather jacket. There were many photos so it would have been hard for AH to miss it. I’m pretty sure she reads the DM though.

Dancing atop the bus, another prime example of KM not coming out of the woodwork:p
 
AH is a walking, squawking textbook example. JMO


Dr Curry said people with borderline disorder can feel slighted easily and they make no attempt at controlling their emotions. They’ll do anything to express anger.

She said borderline and histrionic personality disorder can appear as “two sides of the same coin”.

Describing histrionic personality disorder, Dr Curry said it’s a need to be the centre of attention, adding that those with the condition will need to make up stories to put themselves at the centre as either the “victim” or “princess”.

“With histrionic personality disorder, that underlying drive is to always be the centre of attention, because if you don’t have that attention on you, it feels similar to borderline personality disorder: You feel pretty empty – like you don’t have that sense of being or value,” Dr Curry told the court.

Thanks for the reminders.

In my mind I was thinking about if she were to watch herself on the stand now to review. What would her take-away be? Does she even comprehend her behavior and is that why she wants to do damage control by focusing on everything else but her lies?? Or do her disorders prevent her from seeing anything??

Either way she is unstable and vile.
 
Thanks for the reminders.

In my mind I was thinking about if she were to watch herself on the stand now to review. What would her take-away be? Does she even comprehend her behavior and is that why she wants to do damage control by focusing on everything else but her lies?? Or do her disorders prevent her from seeing anything??

Either way she is unstable and vile.

I think she genuinely believes she has been wronged. She thought she put on a good show and she can't comprehend why no one believes her. Why her lies didn't work.
 
I am wondering if she has been reading or having someone else read all the comments as to why she was not believed. I wonder if someone would tell her her acting skills on the stand were not well received as to her comments, facial expressions and tone and lack of real emotions but most of all the mountains of evidence that really had no back up. Makes me curious to see how she reacted in this interview. Will she act the part of someone who believes they have been done wrong by just about everyone inside and outside of that court room.
 
Just have a few quick minutes and no time to read back on the thread but do i understand correctly AH gave an interview this weekend,hence the flying to NYC, and basically claimed in it that the Jurors did not believe HER, only, mainly, because JD is such a good actor and therefor, beloved guy? In a nutshell? The externalizing of blame is strong in this BPD/HD! :D
Yeah. She’s ‘not taking it personally that the average person” (read: jurors) “didn’t understand what my marriage was like behind closed doors. I wouldn’t expect them to.”

 

Yeah and these two were so rando that they wished more than anything to consider living in the woodwork so they didn’t have to come forward for the lights, camera and action. There was no woodwork for them before the trial and there especially won’t be any now. Thanks Elaine.

Id like to see those action figure people made for each character. So far I’ve only seen Morgan T.

Came across a great feed that broke down different parts of the trial with focusing in on one thing and wondered what the person(s) were saying or thinking at that moment. It would be great if that were done in a sit down with Johnnys team that we could attend. ‘What did you think when so and so did this’? Their facial reactions alone are golden!
 
AH’s new PR team hasn’t done her any favors by letting her continue this rant - IMHO
Exactly, though do you think she will listen to anyone? The "sources close to" AH seem to be engaging in the same gaslighting techniques we saw on the stand. We all know what we saw and heard during the trial and after, yet it continues. AH and her crew are living in an alternate universe.

I have to say calling KM, MN, and MT "randos" is skating on thin ice when all 3 of them came forward voluntarily. MN's friend J in Hicksville mentioned in her Twitter thread that CV could have called her plus another 3-4 to testify including MN, and CV settled on MN.
Part of me would love nothing more right now than for an eager attorney to haul AH's behind back into court with even MORE witnesses. "Randos" they may be in AH's world, but witnesses nonetheless.
 
The trial was in a courtroom not on social media. It wasn't what was or wasn't said on social media it was what she said,on the stand,under oath in a court of law, so forcefully to a jury that condemned her!.

How I wish she would take her own advice and accept some responsibility for once :rolleyes:
Yes, worldwide audiences should put out their eyes and cut off their ears for deceiving them so.

I will say that I am not a fan of online trolling, and a I believe a bigger message could be sent by unfollowing, blocking, and ignoring--don't engage; don't feed the flame--because flying monkeys will never get set straight until they have had enough and want to escape.

That being said, AH could start by taking responsibility for her own "evidence" that only proved JD's case, over and over and over again. Didn't go the way she thought it would at all. As an old boss used to say, "Sorry 'bout your luck" ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 
I hope she says something that results in Johnny collecting big bucks from her. She deserves it.
I would settle for her to be "shook" into silence by, I don't know, being served with one pending litigation after the other--from perjury charges to JD's employees to each and every rando--until it clicks that every time her mouth opens, someone else's bank account goes cha-ching. I can't help but think of Breakfast Club..."You want another one? You got it!"
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
192
Guests online
302
Total visitors
494

Forum statistics

Threads
608,680
Messages
18,244,003
Members
234,421
Latest member
EimearRyan90
Back
Top