VA - Johnny Depp's defamation case against ex Amber Heard, who countersued #13

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves

New Posts

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ms H’s spokesperson:

“As Johnny Depp says he's 'moving forward,' women's rights are moving backward. The verdict's message to victims of domestic violence is...be afraid to stand up and speak out.”

Wrong!

Women’s rights are moving backward because of women who falsely accuse their husbands of domestic violence, blackmail them and lie about it under oath.
 
ZoriahNZ said:
i know, it's crazy. And deeply hypocritical. It's also pretty obvious that JD's legal team is not even bothering to comment on EB's conduct in those interviews. Or AH's activities post trial. It makes it even more glaringly obvious who just can't let things go.
Click to expand...
ZoriahNZ said:
GMA and Today interviews are both scheduled to air on Sunday, correct?
Click to expand...

According to this the interviews are tomorrow morning, unless it has changed.

www.foxnews.com

Johnny Depp’s attorneys are taking a ‘victory lap’ following the verdict, Amber Heard’s spokesperson claims

A spokesperson for Amber Heard shared with Fox News Digital that Johnny Depp's attorneys' interviews with "Good Morning America" and the "Today" show are a "victory lap."
www.foxnews.com www.foxnews.com
 
www.foxnews.com

Johnny Depp’s attorneys are taking a ‘victory lap’ following the verdict, Amber Heard’s spokesperson claims

A spokesperson for Amber Heard shared with Fox News Digital that Johnny Depp's attorneys' interviews with "Good Morning America" and the "Today" show are a "victory lap."
www.foxnews.com www.foxnews.com


“Actually, it didn't require stellar courtroom skills to win this case. Heard was so poorly represented and so poorly coached that she actually self-destructed in slow motion for all to see. SHE secured the defeat and her counsel allowed it to happen”


“Women who lie in the courtroom don't deserve any better than Heard got. Depp's attorneys deserve a victory lap. For Heard to sit with a straight face claiming a 'pledge to pay millions to charity is 'the same as' actually donating the CASH....was a moment to remember. She‘s not credible”
 
Breathe said:
www.dailymail.co.uk

Johnny Depp fans sing Happy Birthday as star, 59, poses for selfies

The actor, 59, posed for selfies and signed autographs while receiving gifts from fans who had waited hours to catch a glimpse of the star outside The Barbican Theatre in York.
www.dailymail.co.uk www.dailymail.co.uk

Johnny Depp fans cheered and sang Happy Birthday in York as the star enjoyed the last night of his UK tour with Jeff Beck.

The actor, 59, posed for selfies and signed autographs while receiving gifts from fans who had waited hours to catch a glimpse of the star outside The Barbican Theatre in York.

Depp, who celebrated his birthday on Thursday, spoke with hundreds of fans before he was whisked away by his security to a tour bus.
Click to expand...
BBM
The dailyfail fishing for clicks... JD's birthday is tomorrow, June 9... Thursday!

MOO JMO
 
Anyone keeping an eye on the eBay auction of The DUI Guy's notes regarding jurors' reactions at the trial? About 13-1/2 hours to go, and bid is $14,369 at this point. Proceeds to go to the CHLA. Pretty neat. Wonder who will win the auction? And will they share information contained in the notes? Can they even read the handwritten notes? I couldn't. Lots of scribbles.

LOL, I wonder if Forman noted sleeping jurors!!
 
ZoriahNZ said:
I agree. And if you listen to all of the audio tapes you will hear indisputable evidence that JD was also abused verbally and emotionally by AH. AH also attempted to control him via drugs (insisting he, an opioid addict, take Xanax multiple times), tried to control his freedom of movement (multiple examples of her chasing him to various rooms, residences, out of elevators etc), initiating arguments which led to him being late to work, refusing to let him leave/de-escalate. She may be claiming financial abuse now, but he discharged all of their joint debts including that horrendous wine bill, and on the tapes you can hear him trying to pay for her Ubers, but she refuses to take money from him. In fact, she claimed in the UK trial under oath that she remained financially independent throughout their relationship and marriage. So why change that story now? Because she needed the jury to believe she was a poor hapless, helpless, vulnerable, naïve, sober victim who was preyed upon by a powerful, older, richer, predatory man. She needed the jury to see JD as another Harvey Weinstein. Luckily, the jury saw through that act.

Abuse is about power and control. It's pretty clear that AH was the one trying to exert control over the relationship. Despite her claims to the contrary, she was the one who had the most power in their private lives. She was suffering from personality disorders (BPD, HPD) and her own heavy substance/alcohol abuse which exacerbated her need to control him, his behavior, his access to friends and family, his time, his attention. The amount of belittling, taunting and verbal haranguing she subjected him to is proof that she was the aggressor and instigator of much of the toxicity in the relationship. In the audio tapes you can hear him trying many times to de-escalate, talk rationally about the problems in the marriage, to explain as patiently as he could what he felt they needed to work on. He's not the one yelling and screaming abuse when things get heated, in fact it's he who tries to keep things calm and civil for the most part. If he was jealous, those fears were not unfounded. We have proof from video footage, nurses notes and friend's depos that she was bringing men into the PH (into HIS home) and being unfaithful. He was powerless to stop his wife's infidelity. You might not have noticed but she was the one isolating him. He was paying for her friends and family to live with her, vacation with her. She was surrounded by her support network. And yet, as others have testified (in terms of them being aware she was manipulative and jealous, monoploizing his time) and you can hear it on the tapes, she told him only she was genuinely looking out for him, only she was truly in his corner the rest were sycophants. She turned him against his friends and colleagues. He became more withdrawn from his support network. This is all textbook stuff in the DV manual.

Yes, he did lash out verbally sometimes in retaliation. That's true. He did return the insults. This is called reactive abuse, when a DV victim has been so beaten down and attacked that they react negatively themselves, then the abuser uses that to justify their violence "see, you called me names, you were mean, you shoved me back/off of you, you are the abuser!". It's a very common phenomenon. I don't think any abuse victims should be expected to just take the constant abuse for years and never react. DV victims are allowed to be imperfect (as AH's team claimed and ironically this applies to JD). Venting texts to other parties about AH and her cheating/lies/abuse do not constitute abuse on AH. They just don't, and it was ridiculous for the defense team to focus so heavily on this. None of those ugly texts or emails were even directed at her.

It's also rather telling that he gave her many chances to stop her public smear campaign, to try to work things out so that neither them would face public repercussions. He tried to protect her 'credibility' that she was so worried about, but she kept blowing things up in a public way. She instigated the public attacks with her TRO, then couldn't back down from it. Then when the divorce was finally settled, they released a joint public statement where they claimed neither was an abuser. Two years later she broke the divorce contract (where neither was to publicly disparage the other) in order to write the Op Ed. She couldn't let it go. She couldn't let Johnny go. You heard it herself from her own mouth on the stand. She couldn't stand that he still had supporters, that he wasn't completely ruined. Her need for control over her victim caused her to lash out once again. But, thankfully, this time, JD decided to stand up and say enough is enough. He held her accountable her words and her actions. He took her to court and he won. Truth and justice won, in my opinion.

And yet AH still can't let it go. She sends out her lawyer to keep being the attack dog on the morning shows. She publicly announces it was a travesty of justice for women and she will be appealing. Look at her complaints through various spokespeople. How dare JD continue on with his life. How dare he fulfill work obligations and not be there for the verdict. How dare he celebrate getting his life back. How dare he join TikTok and thank his fans.

Again, I need to ask, who is obsessed with and trying to control whom? Who is really the jealous one? Who is still trying to harm the other?

All of womanhood and DV victimhood are being destroyed by JD existing and winning his court case!!! Are you kidding me? The weaponizing of MeToo and domestic violence victims, heck even feminism itself against her ex-partner just makes me sick. She doesn't speak for me or for any righteous cause or movement, imo. She needs to quit with the grandiose statements, her narcissistic tendencies are showing.

JMO but I think AH is most upset by the fact that he won't look at her, he won't talk to her, he won't take her back and he won't allow her to control his life for one second more. The rage is palpable. And it scares me. It should scare you, too. We are seeing a narcissistic abuser melting down in real time and in public due to the celebrity factor. I truly hope that she does move on and try to be the best mother she can be, despite her proven character deficits. I really do. I just don't think the story ends here. I hope I am wrong.
Click to expand...

@ZoriahNZ I really don't have the words to explain how much I appreciate this post and do it justice.

Thankyou.
 
ZoriahNZ said:
JMO, I wouldn't be surprised if Brooks was hoping Depp would settle quietly to prevent further public scandal. The alleged incident happened in April 2017, he didn't file his complaint until July 2018. Not influenced by the Op Ed (Oct 2018) in terms of timing, but I wonder if he saw this JD Rolling Stone hit piece which was published 21 Jun 2018:
The Trouble With Johnny Depp

It's possible the man is telling the truth, despite there being multiple witnesses who claim otherwise. I guess we will have to wait and see.
Click to expand...

I read that the scriptwriter has time stamped photographs of the incident that prove there was no physical contact.
This is JMO unless I can find a msm source.
 
neesaki said:
Oh brother…. Here we go. :rolleyes:

slate.com

Two Decisions in the Heard-Depp Trial Could Have Biased the Jury

Ultimately, it was a mistake to treat this case as though it was just any other.
slate.com slate.com
Click to expand...

Ugh! The trial had to be televised imo, just look at all the lies and vitriol that were directed at JD after the UK trial against The Sun (also something that seems to have been twisted to suit the AH narrative).
Also, it wasn't a criminal trial,it was a defamation trial so AH need only have testified that a sexual assault took place,she didn't need to go into such graphic (fantastical) detail. IMO

And could they really justify sequestering a jury for 6 weeks for a defamation trial?
 
Camille had on all black her hair looks amazing! They both look great! Camille says “the key was to focus on the truth and the evidence”.
Ben: “social media had no influence it was based on evidence and testimony”. They are both disappointed that the narrative is this verdict is a blow to the me too movement.”

Sorry didn’t catch everything I was blinded by Camille’s beauty radiating all over the place. I’m sure playback will be up soon. They stayed professional and represented well :)
 
Last edited:
vinayd said:
Camille had on all black her hair looks amazing! They both look great! Camille says “the key was to focus on the truth and the evidence”.
Ben: “social media had no influence it was based on evidence and testimony”. They are both disappointed that the narrative is this verdict is a blow to the me too movement.”

Sorry didn’t catch everything I was blinded by Camille’s beauty radiating all over the place. I’m sure playback will be up soon. They stayed professional and represented well :)
Click to expand...
No gloating about the win whatsoever. They both were very professional, as expected.

What a difference of these interviews from the two different teams.
 
Breathe said:
www.yourtango.com

Johnny Depp Supporters Beg Amber Heard To Speak Out As Her Fans Launch A #CutForAmber Campaign

No one should be going that far for any celebrity.
www.yourtango.com www.yourtango.com

Amber Heard’s fans started a “#CutForAmber” trend and Johnny Depp fans are begging her to condemn it.​

“I went to hospital I was bleeding heavily and they asked me why did you do this? I proudly said for amber #IStandWithAmberHeard #cutforamber,” read one of the many tweets under the #CutForAmber hashtag.

“This is for ANYONE that is considering #CutForAmber as an option. We will facetime you with the alpacas for free in exchange of you not going through with this,” read another tweet that included an image of five adorable alpacas.
Click to expand...
I keep meaning to mention… I’m not convinced this isn’t faked to make his supporters look stupid. Someone had faked what seemed like obvious accompanying clickbait messages claiming to be from one of her accounts (includes an icon with that stupid leaping picture she thinks makes her look so athletic and wonderfully wacky), with her stating some form of approbation (!) about this behavior. Ill advised of MSM to pick it up…
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

DNASolves

Who is DeKalb County John Doe (2022)?

Members online

... and 180 more.
Total: 3,970 (members: 181, guests: 3,789)

Online statistics

Members online
181
Guests online
3,789
Total visitors
3,970
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
603,104
Messages
18,152,022
Members
231,645
Latest member
Hawk53
Back
Top