Did she just say skeLEEtal?
I do strongly believe this.
And why can none of them give a precise reason why they are no longer friends? It’s bizarre to me.
This is something AH ordered someone to plant. mooCan’t be true!
![]()
Is Johnny Depp dating his attorney Camille Vasquez?
Rumors have been swirling online that actor Johnny Depp is dating attorney Camille Vasquez, who questioned Amber Heard on cross-examination.www.foxnews.com
Maybe AH is paying their legal fees. JMOI wonder if she has something on them?
Because they just want to get on with their lives and forget this seedy time of their past? Or....uncomfortable with possible backlash or vindictiveness?I do strongly believe this.
And why can none of them give a precise reason why they are no longer friends? It’s bizarre to me.
Only Amber broke the law.i dont know if anyone remembers but i think it was in 2015 amber and johnny broke the law here in australia by bringing their dogs into australia illegally
MOO - they were gaslit into believing the story she was even then selling. I find AH extremely narcissistic. They are very skilled at abusing while making their victim appear to be the crazy out of control one. Hence their testimony and in some cases (IMO) embellishment at UK trial. Now they feel the must stick to it even as they themselves have figured out the AH is not who they thought she was.It's difficult for me to understand why these witnesses who have distanced themselves from AH are willing to testify to bolster her story. I mean, I have to believe that they were themselves drained by her emotional neediness and drama. How could they not playback the past & ask themselves whether she was telling them the truth or not? I will say that they've generally been complimentary of Johnny. But I think it speaks to how persuasive this personality type is - that people who are so drained by them and distanced themselves can still testify on their behalf. I'd be like "I don't know her." lol. But maybe I'm just mean! And I also wonder how much the fact that they were feeding off her helps in them believing her bs even after the friendship is over.
Exactly! If I were on this jury I'd be pissed!! But this is typical of BPDs (as AH has been diagnosed by Dr. Curry) it's like the runaway train called State of Arizona vs. Jodi Arias. The floor was dirty, the "parqueet" was such and such etc. There's so much unnecessary filler details that confuses everything. There is no way the jury will recall all these inane details.All of this testimony is stuff the world already knows: Johnny and Amber were drinkers, drug users, and fought like mad, and broke things.
NONE of that, supports her outrageous claims of physical and sexual abuse she claims to have suffered via the op-ed piece, which is the entire point of JD's counter suit.
jmo
that is clearly directly at my comment pages ago...fair enough...we all have our opinions.I'm amazed that anyone finds this trial just a hot-mess of exposing dirty laundry by both JD and AH. I am amazed that anyone believes ONLY "Heardsay". I am amazed that anyone believes this trial shouldn't be happening based on their opinion that both AH and JD had toxic personalities and used alcohol/drugs. If I were falsely accused of criminal actions that were only based on the claims by AH, I wouldn't care how much of my life was exposed (good, bad, ugly) to clear my name. False accusations that ruin lives is the only thing truly toxic in this case. Justice (even if just to tell everything to the public) is worth this trial.
jmo
ETA: And, rather ridiculous to even imagine doing this only to revive a career.
And, rather ridiculous to even imagine doing this only to revive a career.I'm amazed that anyone finds this trial just a hot-mess of exposing dirty laundry by both JD and AH. I am amazed that anyone believes ONLY "Heardsay". I am amazed that anyone believes this trial shouldn't be happening based on their opinion that both AH and JD had toxic personalities and used alcohol/drugs. If I were falsely accused of criminal actions that were only based on the claims by AH, I wouldn't care how much of my life was exposed (good, bad, ugly) to clear my name. False accusations that ruin lives is the only thing truly toxic in this case. Justice (even if just to tell everything to the public) is worth this trial.
jmo
ETA: And, rather ridiculous to even imagine doing this only to revive a career.
That is strange for a professional to not know the correct pronunciation.
Exactly! If I were on this jury I'd be pissed!! But this is typical of BPDs (as AH has been diagnosed by Dr. Curry) it's like the runaway train called State of Arizona vs. Jodi Arias. The floor was dirty, the "parqueet" was such and such etc. There's so much unnecessary filler details that confuses everything. There is no way the jury will recall all these inane details.
Hi, I'm not wishing to be argumentative or pedantic but just to mention, in my part of the world, UK, the word 'skeletal' is often pronounced by British academics and medics with emphasis on the middle like 'skuh-lee-tle'. I don't know why and if that is correct / incorrect.
Hi, I'm not wishing to be argumentative or pedantic but just to mention, in my part of the world, UK, the word 'skeletal' is often pronounced by British academics and medics with emphasis on the middle like 'skuh-lee-tle'. I don't know why and if that is correct / incorrect.