beltingitout
New Member
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2010
- Messages
- 171
- Reaction score
- 0
If you are a person that does not want your things messed up, you are NOT going to leave your doors unlocked!
The coffee was probably taken to Kelly and had been drugged.
I agree CCweb BUT if you are just going to tell part of the truth, why say anything at all? It gets people to asking questions and when you fumble over your words or won't answer them, you look suspicious. MOST of the things she said about Kelly were negative. We have a missing person here and this is the last place to vent about negative BS between two people. If I wanted to see that, I'd watch soap operas.
Furthermore, we asked many, many questions about Kelly's habits, colors, music, etc etc., she wouldn't answer those. She only wanted us to know things about Kelly that she wanted us to know, not necessarily the good things.
As far as information that was pulled, IF those things are true and she told those things to the police already, that's where it should have stayed. It was none of our business and for some reason she felt that she needed to continue talking bad about a missing person. This missing person has to have someone in her corner because she is not here to defend herself. I wish she was for her sake. I am sure she would have a few choice words for CinV.
Even if Kelly had bought something from someone, 9 times out of 10, she would want to go look at the product first before buying AND she wouldn't want them coming to her job to deliver it.
Not pointing fingers BUT I remembered reading something interesting in an earlier post from CinV. http://websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=94105&page=15 on post #361. I am not saying that she was available the day that Kelly disappeared BUT obviously the day she had posted this comment, she was on during the day but had to work that afternoon/evening. On another website, CinV's mom stated that she had had lunch with CinV the day that Kelly came up missing, she didn't ellaborate after people asked questions. Again, not pointing fingers BUT I just found those particular things interesting.
I'm not saying that I disagree with the theories that CIV's stories seemed to contradict her own or other people's information about Kelly, but I will say that I remember thinking exactly this when CIV was active on the forums: "She only says what she has to and is purposefully trying not to say too much or reveal too much about her and Kelly." This of course was only in the beginning. Later on, many felt that she said too much or even fabricated/exaggerated the truth (especially on the other site!).
I can understand not wanting to say too much on here. I've been afraid of saying something that will hurt the investigation. Perhaps, CIV felt the same, then later revealed more about Kelly's habits, dates, etc... because we all wanted more info.
Just some angles to consider.