Truthful Lies
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2007
- Messages
- 1,565
- Reaction score
- 338
It was a post made by me. I'll try to go find it, or you can look through my member posts.does anyone have link to this report dont remember it?
It was a post made by me. I'll try to go find it, or you can look through my member posts.does anyone have link to this report dont remember it?
You are correct. That poster is me. Driver is also ex LE and was looking around that night for the safety of his/her clients. I don't even have to open a door from somewhere and he/she is out of the car escorting me. I was/am a little too timid to reveal more, as I was contacted by some PI, but this was reported in full to LE. So, the driver was/is trained to be observant and he did see her.This is all from memory, but I don't recall associating anything other than [white] male "who it seemed knew the woman he was arguing with" (paraphrase) from the grandmother's account, but the limo driver (who is known by a poster on here, iirc) is who stated seeing someone fitting MH's description being followed two, then one, car lengths behind her by a Hispanic male, near the UHall/R.V. parking lots or the bridge (I don't recall specifics).
BBM & snipped
Walker, you make some good points.
Most likely the killer was feeling very paranoid and chose the location as it's within his comfort zone. As far as partying being done by youth at the location, it got cold out quick so that would limit that. Perhaps the perp partied there as a youth several years ago. People may not do that anymore, it was a theory as to why he may have been familiar with it. Maybe it was an old make out spot for locals, maybe dirt bikes, quads were rode there as well as hunting. For some reason, the perp is familiar with the area. Could be he lived around there at one point, or even had childhood friends around there. When i mention possibly it was an old party spot, it could have been for the perp many years ago, doesn't mean it still is today. Kids drink in the woods when they are underage, i did.
As for the body being found, its obvious it would be found there. Maybe he wanted it to be found, he was getting tired, maybe feeling a little guilty?
If he didn't want it found there always is the Atlantic Ocean, tons of mountainous areas to dump a body, not to mention old coal mines if he wanted to take a drive. He didn't. He stuck to what was familiar with him, it almost seems like he did it in haste and didn't really think about it. He didn't bother to burn any evidence. Maybe he is feeling guilt and wanted Morgan's body found?
The part you mention in theory about an exboyfriend, could be a possibility, something triggered him and pissed him off, driving him over the edge to the extreme.
Can anyone help me out? I have been reading through the posts in this thread, and I cannot figure out who "EH" is in this story. Could someone please describe who this person is? Thanks!:crazy:
From public records found on the internet, mother and step-father.
Is it known what his prior offenses were? What indicators do we know that possibly link him other than his geographical location?He is a decent looking 20yr. old registered violent sex offender who lives very close to the farm and works in C'ville.
How does a mother deal with this, I wonder?![]()
This is a very good point. I thought the same thing, with all the mountain locations or even the ocean, which would be more remote in a way. I mean, there was a farmer who worked this land! Not that remote in that regard!
It dawns on me that the perp might have simply been TIRED. By the time that he had done whatever he did, and the resulting adrenaline rush & fall. It could have been that he dumped her body there so he could be rid of it, and go home to get some sleep. I dunno. Its possible. But this was pretty poorly planned, and reeks of being spur of the moment.
Is there any place to see a video of that PC? The language Rader used is peculiar. I'd like to see it.One only wonders.
Going back on topic to yesterday's press conference, I finally had a chance to watch the entire thing, including the Q&A portion at the end.
My impression after watching the entire thing was that yes, indeed, the authorities have either a person of interest or some pretty strong evidence they are withholding from the public, as Lt. Rader's statement of "We are not interested in a confession or suspects"...
Then, later on, when one of the reporters asks him about the terrain he specifically states "I am not here to talk about the offender, I am not here to talk about the offender responsible. We just want information on the area. For now, that's good enough for what we need. I have my reasons for sending the message I'm saying."
What do you all think about this statement?
Is there any place to see a video of that PC? The language Rader used is peculiar. I'd like to see it.
Certainly. Here it is:
http://www.wdbj7.com/Global/story.asp?S=11933882
He specifically states THREE distinct times in the video that he is not interested in suspects.
To me it makes it sound like they know who did it(or a good idea) but can't place him at the spot where her remains were found. They want to know why he chose that spot so they can build their case.
Agreed.
Another reason I think this person knew the area:
When all this was going down, the perp had a dead (or dying) girl in his vehicle- a HIGHLY STRESSFUL moment- I don't believe he would be able to drive around, looking at a GPS (and probably in the dark).
My opinion is he HAD to know the area.
This isn't a place you would just stumble upon- that would more likely be closer to a main road.