I have thought about this a while... and I do not watch a lot of football etc. America (I am of Ukranian background) it can be very hypocritical.
In theory for the average person that goes to jail, the idea is they go to jail, serve the time the judge gives them, are released back into the community, and are expected and encourged to go back to work, be productive, etc. Especially if the crime committed is not related to work. Obviously a child molester shouldnt go back to work at a day care, etc. So if I work in a factory, go to jail for a while, when I get out, I am assumed to be able to go back to work. But a "star" for soome reason that rationale does not apply. Anyone else in Vick's situation would want lawyers to help them out, go for the lightest sentence, etc. But a star is criticized... If you think Vick got a light sentence (maybe he did, maybe he didnt) that isnt his fault its the fault of the legal system. But people find it easier to blame him for what he got. But if you were in his situation, you would aim for that same sentence with your lawyers? So now he is out. He did what he was commanded to by the courts. What do people expect him to do now? Sit at home and collect welfare? What difference does it make where he works. If he worked at the local Coke bottling plant no one would care... but does it really matter? Because he is famous he is not supposed to work? It would be naive to think ok Vick will become something he isnt... suddenly have some different skill like becoming a carpenter or an architect. Hes a football player. So why shouldn't he play football? Its better than welfare or some other BS free income. And football players have limited careers anyway. He will have to find somethign else to do in a few years as it is.