GUILTY VA - Nicole Lovell, 13, Blacksburg, 27 January 2016 #7 Accused Pleads "No Contest"

[Considering]

Can someone remind me? I don't recall Keepers having a KiK account, but maybe I forgot.

I remember something about the name Keepers using the name "Rachel" but I don't remember if it pertained to kik or something else.

Does "Rachel GoldSparrow" or "hugsalskdgfhg" have meaning to anyone?

 

[MalloryPike]

I remember something about the name Keepers using the name "Rachel" but I don't remember if it pertained to kik or something else.

Does "Rachel GoldSparrow" or "hugsalskdgfhg" have meaning to anyone?

Not sure about Rachel GoldSparrow, but the other one looks like what you get when you can’t think of a username and just hit random keys, like hahdjdjejnekwj. I’ve done it before when having to make throwaway, one time use accounts.

 

[Betty P]

I remember something about the name Keepers using the name "Rachel" but I don't remember if it pertained to kik or something else.

Does "Rachel GoldSparrow" or "hugsalskdgfhg" have meaning to anyone?

I did a quick google search with Keepers name and didn't find anything in news around that time. No mention of Keepers having a Kik account. What would she have posted there that would be so problematic for DE? Did he say something to her?

More likely to me would be phone messages from Keepers to Eisenhauer saying "don't kill the girl" or something showing she wasn't at the crime scene at the time of NL's murder. IDK

ETA: Maybe there's a conversation in there where he discusses killing NL, describing it to NK because she wasn't there.

 

[Considering]

Not sure about Rachel GoldSparrow, but the other one looks like what you get when you can’t think of a username and just hit random keys, like hahdjdjejnekwj. I’ve done it before when having to make throwaway, one time use accounts.

That makes sense. I was trying to figure out what "hugsalskdgfhg" stood for and I couldn't get passed "hugs a." Lol

 

[katydid23]

bbm Yes you're right. I wasn't thinking. So he should definitely be convicted of these two charges (abduction, concealment of a body).

And if that abduction ends in murder, then BOTH of the abductors would be found guilty of murder. It does not really matter which one of them stabbed her. They are BOTH guilty if they both took part in the abduction.

 

[terpstra1]

Must be damning evidence if the defense is fighting this hard to keep the jury from hearing it! I think ALL evidence should be shown so that jury doesn't find out later this or that wasn't known to them. How can you make a decision if you aren't given the evidence? Present it all, both sides, and let the jury be informed.

Her attorney is fighting this too because she has her own trial coming up. I feel LE knows she wasn't there the night of the murder or they would have tried them together. I bet it's in the phone records.

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk

 

[katydid23]

The chatter here in the courtroom gallery is that they did go to Fortress Dr and pickup a 3rd person to physically do the murder and finish her off with the shovel. I suspect that is the same man they met at the Target Café. And the foreign DNA on the shovel more than likely is this man on the phone.

That would explain a LOT of what there not telling you and the mysterious drive over to Fortress Dr.

Even IF that was true, DE would still be GUILTY AS CHARGED.

If there is another Guilty person involved then we should find them. But that doesn't make this not guilty.

 

[BUF]

https://twitter.com/Annie_Andersen/status/961717670788960256

https://twitter.com/DomMastrangelo1/status/961716262626873345

Dom posts a photo of DE's mom, crying

https://twitter.com/DomMastrangelo1

His poor mom...I can't imagine being at my son's murder trial.

 

[BUF]

I remember something about the name Keepers using the name "Rachel" but I don't remember if it pertained to kik or something else.

Does "Rachel GoldSparrow" or "hugsalskdgfhg" have meaning to anyone?

Does Rachel GoldSparow have to do with that book that the defense talked about in his opening? I think I remember something about that...anyone else?

 

[BUF]

Didn't the judge already rule on what evidence would be allowed? I thought NK's cell activity was included in that ruling.

 

[epiphany]

Does Rachel GoldSparow have to do with that book that the defense talked about in his opening? I think I remember something about that...anyone else?

Yes, that's where I remember it from, but not much more.

Wasn't there also something about a 13/14 yo girl going missing in talk about that book?

Someone may remember the defense's opening, and post about it

 

[Considering]

Does Rachel GoldSparow have to do with that book that the defense talked about in his opening? I think I remember something about that...anyone else?

That was Cassandra Claire's Clockwork Angel.

 

[BUF]

Yes, that's where I remember it from, but not much more.

Wasn't there also something about a 13/14 yo girl going missing in talk about that book?

Someone may remember the defense's opening, and post about it

Yes, I think it was Betty P who researched the book. Maybe when she checks in she can shed some light on it.

 

[BUF]

That was Cassandra Claire's Clockwork Angel.

That's it. Wish I had your memory!

 

[Considering]

That's it. Wish I had your memory!

Lol. I can't remember where my keys are half the time.

 

[Considering]

This officer has the best expressions!

 

[fred&edna]

The "opening statements" videos are still available at the link below (ya' just gotta scroll down)

http://wset.com/news/local/jurors-t...ole-lovells-2016-killing-trial-starts-tuesday


And, YESorNO posted a lot of research on the book "Clockwork Angel" here:

https://www.websleuths.com/forums/s...uary-2016-7-*Arrests*&p=13915540#post13915540

 

[watergirl62]

Does Rachel GoldSparow have to do with that book that the defense talked about in his opening? I think I remember something about that...anyone else?

I can ask my 13yo SD. Huge fan.

 

[wyome]

Im almost sure you have shown them photos before and they were not connected to this case at all. I can't remember now if I seen it here or another site when I was sleuthing DE. I might be mistaken but that lady with the trolley is a murder victim and this is from years ago. IMO this photo was not taken on the 26th-27th jan 2016.
Its 00.19am here so my brain isn't connecting properly but I will try to find it tomorrow.

You are correct.

 

[bleuboy]

You are correct.

I've just tried looking now and it was made by a poster who was driving everyone silly with conspiracy theories. Like it was commented on that other site if any of it was possibly true about a 3rd culprit, someone would have said something and that story would have grew legs and be everywhere. LE or attorneys could not keep that secret.
That's just my opinion though, that I don't see the point trying to imagine another person when all Nicole's blood is all over things connected to DE and NK. Keepers has done enough talking that I'm sure she would have mentioned someone else too, especially after incriminating herself. She's not that smart IMO.