Madeleine74
Knower of Things
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2011
- Messages
- 11,556
- Reaction score
- 20,084
This was not a statutory rape case. You might want to acquaint yourself with some of the facts of the case before posting. Some might find your "joke" offensive.
And you may want to acquaint yourself with the facts of the case and its outcome as well as read the post above mine, so you can get a clue about what my post actually was about, rather than assuming and making snarky retorts.
I'm commenting on the post above mine and referring to the foreman of this trial who has gone on record saying that he did not consider himself a victim and that's why he answered "no" when he was asked during voir dire if he had ever been a victim of a sexual assault.
And the guy who assaulted the juror years ago: "This man, who asked that his identity be concealed, said he committed the rape involving a juror who helped return the guilty verdicts in the case against two former Vanderbilt University football players. Fourteen years ago, he pleaded no contest to statutory rape involving the individual. “It was originally three counts of statutory rape and I was indicted on 23 counts of statutory rape.”
So yes, there was statutory rape -- specifically involving the juror who was foreman, which is exactly what I was talking about in my post.
As for the joke (it's not mine, it's been around for ages), it can only be understood and appreciated by someone with a droll sense of humor who doesn't take everything so serious or personal.