Morning, all! :seeya:
Well, if I were on the jury, even if I already thought TPS was guilty on both counts, I would want to look at the transcripts (that they hadn't seen during trial) and listen to the search warrant interview where TPS tells Det. Ramirez to sit on the floor (that they hadn't heard during trial) - just to dot their i's and cross their t's - so that the defense couldn't come back and say they didn't base their decision without looking at ALL the evidence. JMHO
As far as the custodial interference, I would say that TPS' phone call to Judge McVay alone on January 4, 2010 - after Elizabeth had been arrested - asking him to give Gabriel back to them, since she still had the guardianship papers, should be proof enough. That had absolutely nothing to do with getting Elizabeth back, since she was already in jail! Again, JMHO
ETA: And I hadn't considered this before, but on January 4, 2010, that guardianship would have already been void for 2 reasons.
1) I didn't realize until closing arguments that TPS didn't put a space for the father to sign on that paper that Elizabeth had signed. Since Logan was legally established as Gabriel's father on December 17, he would have had to sign that paper, too, to make it valid.
2) The judge awarded Logan FULL CUSTODY of Gabriel after Elizabeth ran off to San Antonio at the emergency hearing in December 2009. So Elizabeth had no legal rights to Gabriel, so anything she signed was not legal from that moment on.