Verdict is IN- GUILTY OF FIRST DEGREE MURDER

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
I just can't get past Part 1. She's still hawking her story and the fact that she was convicted of Murder 1 seems to elude the interviewer. I will not watch the rest.
This is my gripe EXACTLY and just the reason I came online to post!! I just finished watching the interview, and I am disgusted that the interview kept referring to it as "the killing" of Travis or something like that - he didn't say "the MURDER" or "after you MURDERED Travis".

This guy may have lucked out to have gotten the first interview, but those were lightweight questions, and inaccurate ones at that!
 
It irked me that he asked her about finding blood on her hands at the Hoover Dam (which was complete BS) and whether or not she would do anything differently. Of course she claimed that she would turn around and drive to the Mesa PD and we know that's a crock.

When she said she would turn around and go the Mesa Police because it was the right thing to do. I thought, sure now she knows her mistakes and now she knows how to get away this the right way. In other words, she's go to the police, turn herself in and cry self defense. Did that make sense, lol. It's late.
 
The fact that she told Ryan, his life wasn't in danger and that she wasn't a serial killer, means she was or would have been IMO.

To quote Juan.. WHO SAYS THAT?!?!


May 8, 2013
One ex-boyfriend of Jodi Arias speaks out

Ex-flame of Jodi Arias reacts to her conviction for first-degree murder, details a prison letter she sent to him
http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/on-the-record/index.html#http://video.foxnews.com/v/2366827864001/one-ex-boyfriend-of-jodi-arias-speaks-out/?playlist_id=86925


If you listen to this interview with RB, he said he and JA had 1 1/2 hour conversation by IM, etc., in which she said she wanted to come to see him. This was on the 30th!

I didn't know that!

5/26 TA tells her it's over

5/28 JA's grandpa's gun is stolen

5/30 JA makes arrangements to see RB


Yet, JA gives an interview after her conviction still claiming it wasn't premeditated. :liar:

State rests!:behindbar

Whatever!
:jail:
fran
 
Yes. I started to watch and then turned it off. I don't need to study that ugliness any more, hoping to glean fragment of fact. There is no truth—ever—from that chick. I am going to put her in my fog and focus on watching and learning how justice works. What a relief!


Sent from my hippocampus using Tapatalk

lol. I wasn't trying to extract the truth from the nonsense, that's not possible. I just wanted to see her put her foot in her mouth.
 
Did anyone see Nurmi today? I haven't seen him in the videos at all. Kind of weird.

And could the interviewer be any more terrible? If he had worked so hard for the interview it never showed. "tell me about this", "tell me about that", "tell me about this"...duuuhhh...
I only saw Nurmi from behind when the Judge dismissed the jury and adjourned for the day. She asked to see the lawyers at the bench.
 
Did anyone see Nurmi today? I haven't seen him in the videos at all. Kind of weird.

And could the interviewer be any more terrible? If he had worked so hard for the interview it never showed. "tell me about this", "tell me about that", "tell me about this"...duuuhhh...

After the jurors were excused

 
It irked me that he asked her about finding blood on her hands at the Hoover Dam (which was complete BS) and whether or not she would do anything differently. Of course she claimed that she would turn around and drive to the Mesa PD and we know that's a crock.

I couldn't be a reporter like him, the first stupid lie out of her mouth and I would call her out on it and end the interview.
 
Saw Mark Geragos on CNN...he said that if she's saying she wants the DP as some sort of reverse psychology move, then she's making a mistake. He said that it would be better for her to get the DP because she would have access to many more resources/options as a death row inmate than she would with LWOP.

Ohhhh so that must be the reason he helped Scott Peterson get the death penalty.... so he would have more resources. :rolleyes:

Geragos also said it was a 5-7 split verdict. :facepalm:
 
After watching the post-conviction interview, it's hard to imagine that Nurmi and Willmott will be able to keep Jodi off the stand in the penalty phase. She won't miss another opportunity to be the focus of attention, sucking all the air out of the court room, spewing more lies.

Both of FJA attorneys need to be careful tomorrow since she threw them under the bus in the interview.
 
If they are a hung jury on aggravating circumstances, we have to enpanel a whole new jury to decide aggravating circumstances.

The time for doubting/questioning the jury is over - they have done the right thing, made the correct decision and will continue to do so until JSS discharges them from her admonitions. Trust in the jury.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
191
Guests online
248
Total visitors
439

Forum statistics

Threads
609,354
Messages
18,253,105
Members
234,638
Latest member
Josefa
Back
Top