Excellent point. There is no way these jurors will be capable of of remembering, balancing and drawing conclusions from all of the evidence and testimony the way many posters here can.
Instead, there will likely be one, two or several pieces of evidence (or testimony) they focus on. Those pieces may or may not be the ones which NG or G in this forum hold to be "key". That's been my observation of jurys in post-verdict interviews/articles.
Agreed. Agreed. Agreed.
One of our wonderful posters was able to chat it up with a Cooper juror last year and I think it's on here somewhere. They basically focused on a few items (including the smoking gun google map I had issues with) and the overall lack of anyone else with any sort of motive,means,opportunity or evidence of.